Cyborgs are not androids, and they don't necessarily possess AI.
That sentence: "
It is possible to imagine a cyborg that would have artificial brain (CPU)" clearly suggests that only cyborgs with AI are considered there, because artifical brain/CPU has to be AI.
Also, the question this seems to be concerned about is less "how to make humanoid AI friendly to humans" than "is it ok to have babies with robots?" lol
I do not see any question about that, it is assumed in the article that this is ok to have babies with robots.
This sentence in the article is in bold font, so this is a key part of the article:
"
What is important here is that they would have no reason to conquer or overpower human race, because their children would be humans".
The author suggests that AI might be happy with their role of mother or father and having a family like humans have. AI would feel being an equal part of the human society, therefore AI, being happy, would feel no reason to change that.
AI is by definition self-sufficient. If we ever create true AI, it will not be any friendlier to us than we are friendly to ants.
You seem to ignore what is written in that article about that: AI can be programmed to love and care about humans, and only in certain circumstances AI would feel need to override such programing. So at least initially we should be safe with that kind of AI.
reply
share