MovieChat Forums > Twin Peaks (2017) Discussion > Does David Lynch even know what's going ...

Does David Lynch even know what's going on?


I think not.

reply

I think he does, and he's laughing at all us simple folk for not picking up on the true meaning from all the clues that he puts RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR FACES.

reply

I hope you're joking. Sadly you sound like the typical Lynch fan douche insisting the Emperor's new clothes are AAAAMMMMAAAAAZZZZZZZING.

To answer the OP. Lynch doesn't know what's going on other than he's cashing a fat paycheck and the drooling morons desperate to appear clever are sucking his balls and licking his butthole clean.

reply

I'm all for David Lynch getting paid, but are you suggesting that getting a paycheck along with your balls and ass licked is bad?

reply

Hell no! It means you're a porn star!

Not an artist, but a porn star.

reply

More people get paid to lick ass than get their asses licked*.

*2008 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

reply

I believe that completely. That's why it's great to be a porn star! (I'm not one. I just know a couple.)

reply

Hell no it's not bad. That said it doesn't make Lynch brilliant. Hell he also has some hot babes doing nude scenes that are pointless other than letting Lynch perv out on some hotties.

Lynch is not the moron. It's the pseudo intellectuals that pretend this nonsense actually means something that are the pathetic fools.

reply

Lol i thought that too. Definitely getting blown by fbi chick.

reply

Exactly. She's not even an actress which explains why she's so awful. Lynch is definitely tapping that ass. Guy is like 70 and all those young cuties are all over him.

That's a lot more impressive than his same old cut and paste weirdness.

reply

I have mad respect for david lynch but he'll never get another isabella rossellini. Im sure the "young cuties" somewhat make up for that.

reply


And people think he doesn't know what he's doing.....?



😎

reply


LOL, Fred!



😎

reply


The short answer is yes, he does. He is a genius. And a lot of folks seem to agree with that as the show is rated 9.2 at IMDB. That's a pretty high rating.



😎

reply

And there's a perfect example. Thanks movieman

reply


You're welcome, pankoeken.



😎

reply

well you're using a loooooot of energy to vocalize your opinion... that's an awful lot of time to spend for something you seem to despise. I honestly couldn't care less about what you think other than this kind of useless posts is the very reason we're here and not on IMDB anymore. I actually agree partly pn what you suggest - that the Lynch afficionados will pretty much swallow anything he makes and scream genius all ove the place - but in this case I completely disagree: I believe that when the show finished 25 years ago he already had in mind the follow up and that for some reasons it wasn't produced. I find the writing remarkable. Sometimes the comedy doesn't work (old Andy for example is a bit embarassing with his clownesque act), but overall this is pretty much conistent with the first two seasons. Perhaps you disliked the original show, which renders your rant useless in my opinion.

reply

No I really enjoyed the original show. Well the first season and about half the second at least. It just sucks that Lynch MIGHT still have some great art left in him but as long as morons desperate to appear clever praise the half assed nonsense Lynch poops out these days we will never see it.

That should frustrate anyone who loved The Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, the original Twin Peaks, The Straight Story etc... I don't despise him. I'm disappointed in him. He's not doing anything he hasn't done ad nauseam. He's lazy and even worse he's contemptuous toward the same sycophants that adore him so blindly and they are too stupid to see it.

Are you actually enjoying the new season so far?

reply

He is an artist. Not the artists who paint animals, fruit bowls or country scenes; his art makes some angry and some extremely excited. That is a true artist. Don't like it...that means he is doing what he intends to do.

reply

Yeah... so how do you distinguish what you call an artist who paints animals or nature morte with what you seem to call a "real" artist? Is it the fact that the latter annoys or is incomprehensible? If that's the case this is the most moronic and short-sighted definition of art that I've ever heard of. Following your reasoning I know a lot of kids who ruined their parents wall whom we should call great artists. This is also why assholes like Jeff Koons are able to sell their crap for millions of dollars.

reply

i do.
Perhaps he overuses the bizarre red room, i thought there was a lot of it and that the strange talking tree seemed ridiculous. I agree that that the surreal takes a lot of place... but that is the continuation of the end of season two.

It appears to me that we have a similar appreciation of the first two seasons: I thought it was marvelous until half of season two, then it went a bit off road. Still, if we take it from there then Ying Dale is trapped in the black/white/red? lodge while Yang/Bob Cooper is out in the wild. If we accept this premise then we accept the fundamentally surreal and mysterious universe of the show and therefore shouldn't be surprised to get those strange in-between world scenes that we've got so far from season 3. The fact that in the first finally Laura tells him that they'll meet again in 25 years gave me the chill. Did he really hope to reenact the show a quarter of a century later? Was it a way to keep the story open? I dunno and don't really care, I'm just so happy that he was able to make it happen and that the story continues consistently from where he left it (plus 25 years of course). Since it was left in hocus pocus land I'm not surprised to continue from there and what's really important is that the story makes sense. And I feel it does: Nicey Dale escaped, bad Dale is really really bad and Gordon's still deaf.

The rest is brewed in Lynch's style, which can annoy me as well. For instances all my movie-nerdy friends despises me because I absolutely hate Mulholland Drive and Lost Highway. That for me felt like a bucket of pseudo-intellectual porridge pored on my sad face. I pretty much loved all his other films but if you talk to a movie lover and tell him what I just wrote, you are blacklisted as an ignorant forever. It's all about the writing: it needs to tell you a story. It can be very simple like eraserhead, but you need to go from one point to another.

reply

We seem to feel very similar down to the disdain for Lost Highway and Mulholland Drive. Why were you disagreeing with me in your first reply? Perhaps I'm a bit too vitriolic towards the Lynch lovers that blindly worship him no matter what? However, look how eagerly someone like modica is to prove my point. You know he/she rushed to buy a golden shit shovel.


It also pisses me off that Lynch can make a creepy thoughtful unique movie that is COHERENT but he won't. Also why is he so hung up on the body/mind transference thing? He's been beating that theme like a dead horse for decades now.

Regardless I will watch Redux and hope Lynch can pull it all together. At least he's giving us some eye candy along with all the static and black lodge brain tree silliness.

reply

I think people give Lynch way too much credit as a storyteller.

His main interest is to film and show us weird or funny scenes which are mostly random. Then the fans over analyse everything he does, they can't understand how it's all connected and therefore conclude that Lynch is a genius.

reply