MovieChat Forums > Krampus (2015) Discussion > How is there still confusion over the en...

How is there still confusion over the ending?


SPOILERS, obviously.


I'm failing to understand how, after months and months of discussion, there is any confusion over the theatrical ending? Understood, SOME things are left for the viewer to interpret, but how else could this ending possibly have been spelled out?

Max wakes up, it's Christmas morning, and he rushes downstairs to greet his loving family. Having learned his lesson, we think all is well. Then there is not-so-subtle shift in tone once he receives a gift with familiar wrapping. At this moment, ethereal elements start to kick in: the fire sparks unnaturally, the room goes quiet and stale, and every character in that room conveys a look of horror once they realize what Max is holding in his hand.

Like Max, they all probably woke up thinking it was some sort of awful dream, but the ill-received ornament proves otherwise as they slowly realize they are indeed not living a happy Christmas morning.

Once we zoom out, it is revealed that the entire scene is taking place in a snow globe, which Krampus grips in his hand. As we zoom out further, Krampus places the globe on a shelf with many other globes, eventually revealing that he has added this family to his ever-growing collection. This is not a happy ending. They belong to Krampus.

The only thing that's really left up to viewer interpretation is: are they doomed to be stuck in a Christmas loop forever? Are they dead and in purgatory? Other than that, I don't know what other visual cues one needs.

To seal the deal even further: there is an alternate ending that is CLEARLY the happy ending. There's no ironic twist, there's no "reveal." Max has learned his lesson, he has his family back, they are all happy and moving on as if the awful events never happened in the first place.

reply

I don't get the confusion either. Especially since Michael Dougherty, you know, the guy who wrote, and directed the movie, as well as createdhis movie's universe, pretty much spells out the good ending.

Michael Dougherty Interview

"We took a page from A Christmas Carol and another page from It's a Wonderful Life," says Dougherty. "Those were two big sources of inspiration. If you really think about those two movies, they're creepy waking nightmares. In A Christmas Carol, we're talking about this broken shell of an old man who's basically terrorized by these Christmas ghosts into being a good person; they’re basically pointing a gun to his head, in essence, and saying, 'Become a good person or you'll end up like this.' And It's a Wonderful Life is very morbid, as much as it's uplifting in the end; you're talking about a movie where a guy is ready to kill himself by jumping off of a bridge until an angel comes along and says, 'You should rethink that because here's what the world would be like if you never existed.'"

Comic Synopsis

Michael Dougherty presents the official graphic novel based on his festive horror comedy, which expands the mythology of this iconic terror with an anthology of three deliciously twisted morality tales that will leave you praying you are not on the naughty list.

Comic Introduction by Michael Dougherty

Bringing Krampus to the big screen was always the main goal, but in order to introduce him to as many people as possible, my cohorts and I knew we needed to build a nest for him in comic books as well. His mythology and history was too big and too rich to be contained to one movie, and after centuries of waiting in the shadows, it only made sense to give the Christmas Devil his due.

Krampus movie commentary with Michael Dougherty

"Ah, A Christmas Carol."

"I think it was important for us to start on this too, sorta setting up what happens later in the story. Ya'know, it's famously a story of someone who goes on a pretend journey or you know, a real journey with ghosts."

"Yeah, there's deffinitly some not so subtle forshadowing by starting with A Christmas Carol. Because...I'm assuming anyone who is actually listening to our commentary has seen the film. But...I was like, 'was I going to spoil the ending?' This is very much like a modern day retelling of A Christmas Carol."

They also mention a few times that this is not a straight up horror movie and that it's a Christmas movie first. And the the old horror version, to them, was crap.


"There's a wonderful book called The Art of Krampus . Did you know that Todd?"

"Oh really? Is that available?"

"Online, at Barnes and Noble, and it goes into great detail about the design and construction of all of our creatures."

"I bet it has like amazing backrounds, paintings and concept designs."

"Yep. It's a fantastic compainion piece to Krampus the Shadow Of Saint Nicholas, which is a graphic novel. Which is also out there."

"It's not his real face. But to me it's something fun. Krampus is a michevious spirit as far as I'm concerned. He's related to Loki. So there's something fun about him wearing this sort of Santa Clause getup, to both mess with the heads of people who do see him, so that for a moment they do think he's Santa Clause. But also sort of mock the idea of Santa Clause itself."

"And because of the way that he works slowly, he doesn't just come in and grab everybody. He gives everyone time to consider what's happening."

"He likes the cat and mouse of it. He likes teaching people a lesson"

Michael Dougherty and the other two also say that everyone including Max learned their lesson and Max did something his Omi never did and that was to offer himself in everyone else's place. He had listened to her. He made a self sacrifice, and put everyone above himself, which is the spirit of Christmas.

Also, the "hero's return", which they debated among each other, one saying it was when he got attoinment and went to Krampus to make a trade, the other saying he thought it was when Max woke up.


So yeah, I don't get it either. But as the old saying goes: You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it think.


Edit: Just came across this: (Also, the art book (which is an AWESOME collector's item) talks about the snow-globes and basically said Krampus uses them to watch the people he's visited.)

I need to order the art book to 100% confirm this though.

reply

Another thing that makes you go "huh?" If they were 'taken', why are they just back in their own house? The house is spotless like it was never damaged. The NEIGHBORHOOD is back like it was too. I sort of wished they had shown something between Krampus and his minions AFTER he dropped Max in the hole, that MAX created. Like Krampus's shoulders drooping or looking at the dark elves to make them shut up... or something. That would have given us a 'little' something that it was ALL going to have to be 'reset' or 'fixed', like "Oh gee, we have another long night ahead of us..." but with no read words being said... but considering the magic involved with the fire, the size difference with Der Klown (like a G1 Transformer), and the freaky little cookies...I feel like there was something else going on behind the scene with the 'villains' the director wasn't telling us the whole story. And I don't mean the dump, the soul stealing factory that makes the evil toys, or anything like that... what I'm talking about is HOW they contain the people and keep them from fighting even AFTER they've been caught. Jordan was found with slime on her. The Cherub was putting something nasty inside the mouth of the mother... what prevents the people inside the Klown from fighting? What is that slime? Or heck even being taken by the elves? They just...wrap them up? Shouldn't have we seen the family in the back of the sled collected together?? Maybe even seen a half-frozen roped up Beth or SOMETHING? Maybe even them all yelling at each other in Krampus's sled or something? I mean, the uncle was fairly fine when he went through the window. What was the rest of his story? Was Omi taken down into the bag? I love the movie, but there were a LOT of "Say wha?" throughout the movie. Or just for the audience to simply either to imagine or fill in the blanks.

I really feel a sequel is needed here to really wrap the loose ends up. From the Krampus Bell Universe jumping ideas, to seeing HIS world, to even having the people find the slime and how it is used and maybe what it is or where it comes from, using it ON the elves... SOMETHING. To even seeing/finding their OWN snow globe in his shop. And maybe even half destroying Krampus with fire... or dark elves turning sides... there's so much you can do with it all with what we've been presented thus far. To even creating a few more evil toys.


3rd generation American from a long line of Gottscheers... it was Drandul, dude!

reply

"If they were 'taken', why are they just back in their own house? The house is spotless like it was never damaged. The NEIGHBORHOOD is back like it was too."

What if the house/neighborhood Krampus visits families in is some sort of dream world; and the house/neighborhood in the snow globes are the actual homes. That would make the whole cleanup afterwards unnecessary.

reply

They are not in snow globes. Apparently in The Art Of Krampus book, it says that the snowglobes are used to spy on the families.

reply

I just watched this again finally and I thought the same as you but now I'm not sure.

-They had neighbors still and their houses were lit across the street

-The grandma/Omi never got her parents back

So I think Max apparently did something right. Or their punishment was lesser...

reply

Optical illusion of the snowglobe

The grandma never chased Krampus after recieving the gift and never were thrown into the underworld for it.

Max punisment was WORSE because he was MORE SELFISH. even in the very end he still wantsKrampus to reward him.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

Optical illusion of the snowglobe


Except that in The Art of Krampus book, which is a behind the scenes book, it says that the snowglobes are used to watch the families.

reply

which is a behind the scenes book

And therefore completely irrelevant to what we see in the movie.



---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

And therefore completely irrelevant to what we see in the movie.


I am going to quote Burt from Tremors 3. "Is your head up your @$$ for the warmth?" How is it "completely irrelevant"? It is a behind the scenes book, that EXPLAINS what the snowglobes are used for. I heard IMDB people could be stupid, but I NEVER have seen so much pigheadedness and stupidity all rolled up into one until I came to this board. Here's a thought. Why don't you and everyone who thinks like you (egotistical) actually use your brains. Why is it so hard to accept that the ending you thought you got was false even when the evidence is smack dab in your face? You didn't created this movie, nor its universe, so don't even pretend to think you know more than the man who DID create it. It's not the ending you wanted so you just decide to stay in your own little world? That is pathetic. A lot more so than me finally blowing up about IMDB stupidity. Which, by the way, is a bit stupid too since I should have known there would be idiots on here.

reply

--insert civilized golf clap here--


3rd generation American from a long line of Gottscheers... it was Drandul, dude!

reply

Please show your lack of knowledge elsewhere. The author claiming something is not eqivalent to truth. I suggest you learn some art critique before posting again.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

A 'fan' like you knows jack about the universe the guy created. If he says how his universe works, and even expands on that, he is in the right because he knows how his own universe works, and you are making a fool and a joke of yourself for thinking you know more about the movie HE made than him. So I suggest you grow a brain and know that the guy who makes a movie knows more about said movie than you before posting again.

reply

Han Solo shot first.

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

You just summed up my thoughts on IMDB users perfectly. I loved this comment! But yeah, you're right though, the family have been restored to their lives because of Max's sacrifice, with the snow globes serving as "crystal balls" of sorts, so Krampus can watch the family if they act out again. See, Omi never repented for her wrongdoing or told Krampus that she revoked her wish, she just stood there feeling sorry for herself and that's why she never got her family back. However Max not only took back his wish, but offered himself up in his family's place, and this is what Krampus wanted all along and why he and his minions were laughing and celebrating when he did it. The were rejoiced that he finally learned his lesson and their hard work paid off.

This ending is actually spelled out several times in the movie and also in the companion works including the comic and artwork book. See, the problem is however, that some horror buffs have been so jaded by twisted foreign films that they can't accept that a good horror movie can have not only a happy ending but also a strong moral, so they invent their own dark ending to the movie (despite how little sense it makes) in order to satisfy their own need for nihilism from any horror film they see.

reply

I agree with you, but their laughs... I don't know. It didn't seem like celebrating to me... maybe it was their way of celebrating. But Max didn't think so. Still love that scene where Krampus takes Max's tear. And it could very well be a celebration for the family of sorts, just how terrifying they looked, when they laughed... FOR them it didn't seem very...'joyful' to Max nor the viewers... but that's very astute thinking about it that way. And who knows, you may very well be correct too!


3rd generation American from a long line of Gottscheers... it was Drandul, dude!

reply

Yeah, I just interpreted it as they were celebrating, but Max was in a state of fear (as were the audience to an extent) so he didn't see it that way. He saw it as mockery at his "futile attempt to set things right." But Krampus was clearly emotionally moved by Max's sacrifice, as is seen during the part you described when he wipes off his tear. Now, I DO think they were laughing at him when Krampus lifted him over the pit to drop him in, but I believe it was because Max was freaking out and begging for mercy, even though Krampus was about to give him what he wanted. They were amused that he was panicking even though something good was about to happen.

reply

Its an ambiguous ending. You can argue that they are stuck in the Underworld by the Krampus, or you could argue that they were released and are just being watched by the Krampus. Both of those options are realistic, given what we saw in the movie.

The fact that there are so many discussions about this is proof that there is not a clear explanation to someone who has just seen the movie.

reply

> The only thing that's really left up to viewer interpretation is: are they doomed to be stuck in a Christmas loop forever? Are they dead and in purgatory?

I don't really see a loop. The events of the movie begin a couple of days before Christmas and Max wakes up on Christmas Day. There is no loop.

So, for me, that's my question; does the family in the globe continue forward with their lives? Are they in a time loop that we are not shown? Will they bump into the glass dome at the end of the driveway? What about the truck drivers and the boyfriend's family?

Each question has a completely different answer depending on whether they are stuck in the globe or are back in the suburbs.

--
What Would Jesus Do For A Klondike Bar (WWJDFAKB)?

reply

No idea.

reply

It's pretty damn obvious everything really did happen to them and they're being watched by Krampus. Why some think they're trapped in some Christmas hell beats me. The snow globe was just a way to show he was lurking. Besides that it goes against Krampus and what he's trying to accomplish. Granted this interpretation of the lore is a bit different but the overall purpose the myth remains the same. He exists to teach and punish not mindlessly terrorize families for all eternally.

reply

The only thing that's really left up to viewer interpretation is: are they doomed to be stuck in a Christmas loop forever?

Krampus seemed to have shrunk them down to little tiny people as well.

I was wondering if they managed to break their snow globe whether they could have shimmied down on to the ground and escaped and had little people adventures escaping Krampus' evil layer? Just like The Borrowers...

Krampus 2?

reply

The best part about this post talking down to people for not understanding, is that you are wrong. 🤣

reply