Sgt. Carl Rasmussen


What do you think of Sgt. Carl Rasmussen? Behavior that he showed was far from military officer especially of the western army. He showed a behavior of a coward who hid from battles during the whole war against real soldiers and now he found his "hero" moment on the column of surrendered, starved mostly minor boys aged between 13-18 to molest. Is that how real soldiers act or coward bums?

I can understand at some point that brutalization in war over prisoners of war can happen. Especially if that group of prisoners of war were suspected of doing war crimes like SS battalions or refuse to cooperate within the terms of a convention.

reply

We can't know what did during the war but from his uniform I would guess he fought with the English before the liberation. he might've been a paratrooper.

Also, he DIDN'T molest or starve them purposefully. It's not like there was an abundant amount of food everywhere and it was made clear to him that he wasn't to smuggle in food for them because the native population was prioritised first.

It seems to me that you didn't really follow the whole film through and through.

reply

You haven´t read my post clearly. I have meant the conduct what he performed over those boys. Soldiers do not act like that. Especially over starved, scared and above all surrendered mobilized children. Not even a professional army. Right in the beginning of the movie you can see "brave" Rasmussen performing force over surrendered column of boys. He even beat one carrying a Danish flag. I mean, congratulations hero.

reply

War is hell is a phrase that should explain why people do what they do... Rasmussen might not be a war hero but I'm sure he fought with the allies. Besides, the whole opening scene is just meant to portray him as someone who REALLY hates the occupying force so his personal journey comes off that much more powerful.

reply

I would understand that if Danish had suffered under the Nazi rule. As I remember they were considered also as a "higher race" by the Germans. I would understand his behavior if he was of Slavic origin or Jewish but this is just tragicomic.

reply

Just imagine your nation has been occupied by Nazis from 1940 into 1945. None of us know how we would really behave in his shoes unless we lived through that sort of event.

Whoop dat trick!

reply

Actually it was occupied by Nazis. And well on the scale of the Nazi standards as Slavs we were not considered as "Germanic 'brother' people" nor "fellow Nordic Aryans" like Danish were therefore we were not on the desired list to continue existing. At least not as free people rather slaves in the best case scenario.

I don´t have to specify what atrocities Germans have done in my country that Danish never experienced and still conduct like that over children was and still is considered as cowardice. A grown man should never act like that over a child. Not to mention a soldier of a Western army. People who act like Rassmusen did over POW´s are mostly the ones who have avoided the combat and they are called cowards. Like those English cowards who sucked ass against Germans in the open battles through the entire war so they had to show their manhood over boys after German capitulation. Brave. :)

reply

While the Danes didn't suffer nearly as much as other occupied nations you can be damn sure they still bore ill feelings towards the Germans. You can't relativise occupations and then imply the Danes didn't have much to be angry about.

reply

Many Danes felt a deep hatred towards Germans after the liberation in 1945. The conditions in Denmark were a lot better than most of the other occupied countries in Europe, so this might sound a bit strange at first. But you have to understand that Denmark had a special policy of cooperation with the Germans during the war. In effect this prevented the Danish government from being overthrown, like in Norway. The government tried to keep everything as close to "business as usual" under these extreme circumstances, and this was generally allowed by the Germans as long as it didn't interfere with their interests.

The policy of cooperation is still a highly controversial subject in Denmark, and a lot of people have tried to sweep it under the rug since then. Many Danish historians have since then argued that the quick surrender of the Danes in 1940 and this policy led to a collective feeling of shame. The strong antipathy towards anything German was in reality like a coping mechanism that a lot of people utilized trying to divert the attention from the policy of cooperation and their own lack of resistance during the occupation.

The Danes were extremely harsh in dealing with anybody who had ties to Germans after 1945 when you consider what the general population had to endure compared to the other countries. In this perspective the actions of Sgt. Rasmussen seems very realistic to me. I totally buy the premise that he didn't view the German boys as humans in the beginning, which helps to explain many of his early actions, but much of the movie then focuses on the shift in his attitude as he gets to know them better...

reply

I have no idea what you mean. In fact, still today many Danish people are not too fond of Germans. And you question the hatred this military guy felt for the German soldiers right after WWII?

reply

I don't know if his character is based upon a real person, but from his armband (in the beginning of the movie) it would suggest he's a freedom fighter from the war which means he was emotional involved in the war and fought the nazis on first hand one way or another.

reply

You want him to wear his uniform all the time :-)

reply

I thought I could reply in a constructive way as the OP didn't seem to have watched the same film and probably doesn't know much about history, psychology, or the military. Then I noticed the OP calling the English cowards further down the thread and failing to understand the nature of occupation - so troll seemed confirmed. It's pointless to attempt to engage with someone who is ignorant but I will nonetheless post my perspective for the benefit of others.

Rasmussen is wearing the uniform of the British Parachute Regiment (2nd Battalion I think), and would likely have been a Danish volunteer who signed up after his own country was occupied - hardly cowardly behaviour.

His country littered with the legacy of war. He has been fighting to get his country back and is rightly pissed off - as displayed during the start of the film where he yells "this is my land (country)" at the column of prisoners after beating one and reclaiming a Danish flag.

Also, he isn't an officer (i.e. commissioned). He's a sergeant as denoted by the three stripes on his uniform. Sergeant is a non-commissioned rank and typically the idea of the "grizzled soldier" is a senior enlisted man - such as a sergeant. They are often represented as border-line bullies, harsh but honourable and they get the job done. As such he is characterised in the film pretty well.

As the citizen of an occupied nation dragged into war his hostility and general indifference towards German soldiers is understandable. These boys ARE soldiers and, despite their age, representatives of a brutal enemy. A number of them had seen combat.

As someone else has said, he didn't starve or molest the young soldiers. He was unpleasant for much of the film but when he was severe (or molesting, as the OP puts it) it was not without cause, to reinforce a valid point or because he had been ordered by the officer above him. Food was short because the citizens of Denmark were given priority over a defeated enemy. When he chastised the boys after his dog was killed it was because they failed to clear the minefield - this could/and almost does cost a civilian their life.

Actually, I thought - and the film tried to present it this way - that he was a decent soldier and human being who found himself in a difficult situation (again caused by the Germans). He was actually rather sympathetic to the boys as boys once he starts seeing them as more than simply the enemy. On several occasions he puts himself at risk in their best interests: for example, when he goes to the aid post to check on the condition of the injured boy and collect food and is later chastised by the officer, next when he intervenes to stop the officers threatening the boys with a pistol, towards the end where he demands the officer send the boys home, and then...

I thought his character was actually quite realistically represented. He was an *beep* at the start but I wouldn't say he was a coward or particularly brutal to the boys. There's even a brief scene where he is rocking on his heels alone in his room - the tell-tale sign of a tortured soul.

I'd actually say Rasmussen was the opposite of a coward.

A good film IMO.

(Edit: The only time I would say he's truly nasty is when he makes them walk the freshly cleared minefield just to prove his point.)

reply

"I thought I could reply in a constructive way as the OP didn't seem to have watched the same film and probably doesn't know much about history, psychology, or the military. Then I noticed the OP calling the English cowards further down the thread and failing to understand the nature of occupation - so troll seemed confirmed. It's pointless to attempt to engage with someone who is ignorant but I will nonetheless post my perspective for the benefit of others."

I have served in the military, thank you. And I am maybe not from one of those "civilized" West armies but urinating on POW´s that is mobilized children soldiers was not something that was considered as acceptable in any era. The one who would do that would lose respect from his fellow soldiers. Maybe in your culture that was ok then and still is I don´t know. But in mine, only cowards and bastards do acts like that, not soldiers nor men ever.


"Rasmussen is wearing the uniform of the British Parachute Regiment (2nd Battalion I think), and would likely have been a Danish volunteer who signed up after his own country was occupied - hardly cowardly behaviour."

A uniform unfortunately does not make somebody immune to cowardice. From my experience, combat veterans do not molest POW´s, children even less. That was reserved for rats from the rear who never saw combat. They had the urge to show their manhood over tied soldiers. And Rasmussen is one of that people. To people like that I have no problem spitting in the face. They are a disgrace to their uniform and country they represent.

"His country littered with the legacy of war. He has been fighting to get his country back and is rightly pissed off - as displayed during the start of the film where he yells "this is my land (country)" at the column of prisoners after beating one and reclaiming a Danish flag."

Well he could have reclaimed it in 1940 from the real soldiers. Where was he then? It is easier to beat surrendered mobilized children than real Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS troops isn´t it?

"Also, he isn't an officer (i.e. commissioned). He's a sergeant as denoted by the three stripes on his uniform. Sergeant is a non-commissioned rank and typically the idea of the "grizzled soldier" is a senior enlisted man - such as a sergeant. They are often represented as border-line bullies, harsh but honourable and they get the job done. As such he is characterised in the film pretty well. "

Yes you are right he was not an officer my mistake. Still that does not justifies him for beating a 13 year old child like that. Does "pick somebody of your own size" mean something to you? At least real soldiers know that. Cowards on the other hand, don´t.

"As the citizen of an occupied nation dragged into war his hostility and general indifference towards German soldiers is understandable. These boys ARE soldiers and, despite their age, representatives of a brutal enemy. A number of them had seen combat."

So what? That is not the way to treat prisoners. If they have done something wrong, there is a firing squad for that or a front row in disarming mines. They have surrendered and placed in POW camps to disarm mines. They already had to pay the price of their fathers. Most of them would die anyway. We are talking here about Rasmussen´s character. Grown people do not beat, piss, molest children. That is simply not accepted ever.

The rest of the text I can agree to some point. but still those drunk British soldiers and Rasmussen is a clear representative of people with no combat experience but huge ego. Veterans who are chiseled and baked in combat usually have more respect to their enemies IMHO.

reply

When did Sgt. Rasmussen beat "a 13 year old child"? I remember him punching some POWs in the very beginning, and slapping Morbach, that grouchy youngman who was originally an officer. And that is it. All these are at least 17-18 years old, which is actually the age range numberless British, American, Soviet and German soldiers fitted in when they were drafted to front line units. It's possible that Sgt. Rasmussen himself encountered in battle many ruthless enemies this old. He didn't really feel sorry for them; it was quite the opposite.

Sgt. Rasmussen was indeed unpleasent to everyone, as we conclude after he sends the ill twins back to work. But he was supposed to look harsh and prompt fear. German POWs had to get the work done as soon as possible. They had to realize that their life relied on defusing mines -a task which requires seriety and attention. They weren't going to a summer camp and Sgt. Rasmussen made sure it remained like that.

There was a scene I found disturbing, however. British soldiers ganged up on a puny boy and harassed him. One could argue they effectively tortured him. Sgt. Rasmussen rightly intervened, ceasing such disgusting and coward act.

reply

[deleted]


German POWs had to get the work done as soon as possible. They had to realize that their life relied on defusing mines -a task which requires seriety and attention. They weren't going to a summer camp and Sgt. Rasmussen made sure it remained like that.

To be honest, I think the purpose of actually getting the mines cleared is secondary to the punitive, retributive motive of putting untrained, starved children to defuse mines (which is, as you say, work that requires attention).

Obviously the German POWs were simply expendable labour force whose lives didn't matter, and Sgt. Rasmussen seems to portray this sentiment in the film, initially, but after working with them starts to feel pity.

Then again, this case of these German POWs was hardly the worst war crime in the post-war years.

reply

You might be right. On one side, Danes aimed to erase any remembrance of the German occupation. On the other side, they were anxious to witness the humiliation of the defeated, wicked enemy. The mines on the coast serve as a fine filling for both sentiments. Which one was preponderant, I don't know.

Sgt. Rasmussen felt disappointed when he realised his subordinates were actually amateurs. He was waiting hardened and skilled POWs, not kids. Therefore, it sounds to me like the original intention was to get rid of the mines and nothing more. That is how the whole thing of bringing prisoners to the beaches was supposed to work in the eyes of ordinary people like Rasmussen. Possibly, the high ranking officers had evil goals in mind (as Lieutenant Ebbe's performance makes clear), but it's hard to claim the existence of an open vengeful wish sponsored by the State itself.

reply

Yeah, sounds pretty much right.

An interesting tidbit that in reality these mine clearing operations were supervised by the British and teams were led by German officers. It felt a bit of a lapsus to have that one young lieutenant crawling around the beach considering how differently officer POWs were treated compared to the enlisted men.

reply

I agree.

One of the most beautiful parts of the film is how the relationship between the young recruits and Rasmussen develops.

reply

Are you from Denmark?

reply