Hi! Sorry I did not respond earlier. I have finished the series, and I don't think it really matches the ending of the book from what I can recall. I am presently about halfway through rereading the book, so I cannot make a concrete statement yet.
One thing I can tell you about the show compared to what I have read of the book so far, is that they seem to have taken a serious, high-minded historical novel and adapted it for TV in the spirit of one of those Harold Robbins-style lurid potboilers of the 1970s... Not that there's anything wrong with lurid potboilers, of course.
This criticism applies mainly to the 1915 and 1988 era segments of the show. Sometimes it felt like watching Dallas or Yellowstone. The 1850s segments seem to be taken more seriously. At times, watching Toshaway and his adopted white son, Tieteti (Eli) I was reminded of Chief Dan George and Dustin Hoffman in "Little Big Man".
Season 2 definitely suffers in comparison to season 1. I felt so cheated that we never even got to see Eli and Ingrid reach white civilization and attempt to reintegrate. There's this huge mysterious gap in their relationship between the two of them riding away after killing the cavalry officer in 1851 and Eli showing up at her door in 1915.
reply
share