Why have an interracial couple?

Yeah but in movieland I don't like it.

Skin colour isn't the only difference. They have different nose shapes, lip sizes, facial bone structure, eye shapes, hair type and texture and hair and eye colour and even body proporitons. Europeans and sub-Saharan Africans look very different beyond just skin tone.

And yes, it is a problem. Interracial couples will result in the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of European looking people. Interracial couples cannot produce a child that looks like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly.

"Interracial couples exist, whether you like it or not."

They do, but that doesn't mean white extinction should be promoted in movies. Keep couples the same race in movies instead of spreading propaganda normalizing white extinction.

Why are you defending interracial couples anyway?

Just because they exist, doesnt mean it is right. We were made to look different and talk different because God wanted us to. Can we end this, "let's all become one race?"

No, they are not. They will become more common, but they will never be the norm. At some point white people will realize that they are being annihilated through mixing and they will turn against it and stick to their own kind in order to preserve European beauty for the future.

There is a reason interracial couples are nearly non existent in South Africa - whites there are the minority and because of that they have a stronger sense of racial identity and wish to preserve the European facial features and hair that make them look distinct from the native Africans, instead of wiping out those features through mixing. This will happen in the USA too. At some point a beautiful white blonde with straight hair, blue eyes, a long narrow nose and small lips will realize that it's not cool for her to wipe out those features and contribute to their extinction by having black or Asian kids. She will have pride and will decide to have children in her own racial image to preserve it.

That is the future.

The actress herself, Tika Sumpter, is engaged to a white guy.

You don't see anything wrong with the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people and European appearances? Do you want a future where distinct, purely-European looking white women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly do not exist and have gone extinct? DO you want a future where everyone in Europe looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods?

Why would you want that? Do you have a problem with white people and European features? DO you get paid by PoC to support race mixing and white extinction?

You don't see anything wrong with the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people and European appearances? Do you want a future where distinct, purely-European looking white women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly do not exist and have gone extinct? DO you want a future where everyone in Europe looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods?

Why would you want that? Do you have a problem with white people and European features? DO you get paid by PoC to support race mixing and white extinction?

Also, careful about calling white people "inbreds". By that logic all pure, non-mixed people on the planet are inbred, including BILLIONS of Africans, Asians, Indians and Middle Eastern people.

"There is no SJW agenda"

There most certainly is. Forced racially diverse representation by pressuring white writers and white filmmakers to put racial diversity in their films at any cost, even if it means a racially diverse family. And then there is the greater, Kalergian goal of globalists - the wiping out of distinct European beauty, facial features and hair in favour of the creation of a single, monolithic race of which everyone looks exactly the same and Afro-Asian, like Tiger Woods. They want the USA and Europe to be the melting pot experiment zones where that monolithic race is supposed to be created.