While it's incredibly tempting to call Mike Ryan a moron, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and chalk up the ignorance he's dishing out to a yellow journalistic urge for page views.
Bottom line, Mike is reading way too much into relatively meaningless events.
2. Then James Corden goes on Howard Stern’s radio show and is asked about potentially replacing Colbert as the host of The Late Show
switching Colbert and Corden actually makes some sense.
When you're consistently getting .2s in the demo, as Corden is, you're not a replacer, you're the replacee. The fact that someone on the Howard Stern Show is dumb enough to not know how ratings work doesn't make this news.
The truth is, he’s playing a character right now, and he’s not very good at it.
How many pundits are going to keep parroting this crap? I know, losing the Report persona is painful, perhaps painful enough to foster a few months of denial, but wake up already. What we're seeing right now is the 'real' Stephen Colbert. The Report persona is dead. Kaput. In the words of Monty Python, "THIS PARROT IS NO MORE!"
4. I think at this point it’s a safe bet to assume that David Letterman isn’t the biggest fan of Stephen Colbert’s Late Show.
If you watch Letterman's interview, it's crystal clear that he neither endorses the new Late Show, nor condemns it. Is it really that much of a surprise that Dave is apathetic about the whole thing?
How many different ways can Mike Ryan attempt to spin non news into news? It's pathetic. Colbert IS having a bad week, but not for the reasons outlined in the article. He scored .3s in the demo on Monday and Wednesday, and, on Monday and Tuesday, lost to reruns of Kimmel. Stern, Handler, Letterman, and Stewart can do and say anything they damn well please- any week with a .3 rating is a very bad week.
reply
share