embarrassing....


embarrassing....to see Mel Gibson in a "movie" just to make money...

see you in the next life

reply

Mel doesn't need money; he has more money than most of Hollywood put together. If you followed the progression of this, you would not have typed that.


He was awesome in everything he does. Yeah, he doesn't need money. Knee-jerk reaction. 

"Guys like you don't die on toilets." Mel Gibson-Riggs, Lethal Weapon

reply

It's an embarrassing that someone that ruined the Assault on precinct 13 remake got to direct this movie and ruin it with shaky cam, zoom crazy framing and a crappy female lead.

reply

I think Richet's claim to fame will be the Mesrine movies, not Assault on Precinct 13.

reply

Nahh, what's embarrassing is watching Gods Of Egypt, or Suicide Squad, that was pure embarrassment for everyone being apart of those films. Blood Father was much much better than those.

reply

That's what I "thought" it was. You know those covers where legend actor's are on a movie that went straight to Redbox or Netflix.

But not this one, this one was surprisingly good.

reply

I have to completely disagree. Mel can afford to never work again or to work for free. Link is a character who made a lot of past mistakes and regrets that he's trying to overcome and find some form of redemption. It was very clear this role meant a lot to him personally.

reply

[deleted]

Clearly the OP is a Zionist of some description, if you know what I mean.

reply

teq_1962...I was thinking the same thing during the whole movie...cause the movie is so damn mediocre and so is Mels acting in this crap...he have made such good movies and roles before but here it looks like he only doing it for the paycheck.

~If the realistic details fails, the movie fails~

reply