MovieChat Forums > Allied (2016) Discussion > The broad was too old to have a baby?

The broad was too old to have a baby?


Anyone else notice this?

reply

She's 40-41, how is that too old?

reply

geriatric

reply

Lol i think she has a few more years to go before she's considered geriatric.

reply

Actually 35+ is considered "Maternal geriatric"...
ask any ob/gyn

reply

So, Birdman, are you enjoying high school? JK 40-41 is hardly geriatric. Maybe back in the 1800s and early 1900s it was, but not now.

reply

Considering she is currently pregnant...I would say...
No, I didn't notice she was to old to have a baby.

reply

Ugly too.

reply

Lol she's waaay prettier than Jolie. Classy and incredibly talented too.

reply

I think she's beautiful and a good actress. I liked her in the Batman movie as well.

reply

Did anyone notice that the currently pregnant 40 year old actress was playing a pregnant character in a movie? No why would we. There is nothing unusual about that. My grandmother had her last child when she was 47, my mom had her last child when she was 38 and one of my sister's had her child when she was in her late 30's.

reply

Nothing unusual at all. Especially these days, as many young women put off having kids for career reasons. I known many a woman who had a baby after 40. The average age for menopause is around 50, so that should give an indication of how many 40 yo women can have babies.

reply

My grandmother had my father in 1949 when she was 39; my other grandmother had my youngest uncle when she was 44 in 1956. There were "old" pregnancies, even back in the 40s and 50s.

reply

She just had a baby in real life 3-4 years ago

reply