MovieChat Forums > Moana (2016) Discussion > Complaints about Maui's size

Complaints about Maui's size


About a week or so ago articles began popping up stating some people are critizing the look of demigod Maui by claiming his design is disrespectful to Polynesian culture and portraying negative sterotypes because he is fat. One such article is:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/27/disney-depiction-of-obese-polynesian-god-in-film-moana-sparks-anger

Variations offering different quotes can be found at other websites.

Personally, we I first saw him I thought he was just a big, strong guy like you sometimes see in real life. Maybe a bit exaggerated, but that is common in animation and large guyes are often supposed to be stocky strong not body builder strong.

Three points specificslly came to mind:

1. The professional bodybuilder physique like Dwayne Johnson maintains requires a very strict training regiment and diet. One most people who do work out do not bother to try and maintain let alone somebody without regular access to a gym or a way to measure calories. Maui no doubt gets plenty of exercise in his life, but not the type that creates the chiseled look. Should Disney really portray and idealistic body image most people do not have? Hasn't Hollywood been criticized for that?

2. Some of the world's strongest men when glanced at look fat. Look at photos of wrestler Andre the Giant or Mark Henry, professional power lifter and winner of the World's Strongest Man competition. Both were/are powerhouses who worked/work out a lot and both like large and not chiseled. Same with many people who are among the world's strongest men. Maui has that type of build.

Edit: For that matter also compare him to sumo wrestlers.

3. Many Polynesian men are large. That is a statistical fact. Hollywood itself is often criticized for not having diverse body types. Isn't having a large Polynesian serving as a positive role model a good thing? Isn't that bringing diversity to the screen? How is that negative?

thoughts/comments?

reply

It's just the usual fake highly exaggerated "controversy" that everyone will forget about in a few months. You know, the kind that "news" websites like The Guardian, HuffPost, and Salon use to boost their ad revenue for a couple of months. Best to ignore it and not take the click-bait.

reply

"Size doesn't matter" - Princess Anna of Arendelle

reply

Forget it. People just like to be pissed off on everything

reply

Wby is it seem to always be Disney animated films that are targeted by this stupid crap?

reply

Disney doesn't usually fight back so they're easy targets.

reply

He is supposed to be a larger than life character. Sure his proportions are exaggerated. Look back at The Rock's uncles The Wild Samoans, they have a similar build as Maui.

reply

I think Disney films will always get these criticisms because a) they are high profile and b) they target children. These questions are always worth considering but ultimately one has to look at it in the context of...it's a Disney movie, and Disney has an unfortunate century-long legacy of racism that it has tried to combat in the past few years, but still is saddled with to some degree, in many eyes. If this were a small movie made by a studio no one had heard of it would probably not attract negative attention at all. If anything it would be called "a much needed example of diversity" and "the kind of thing big studios should take as their example" etc etc.

Basically I don't have a problem with people criticizing it, it's important to have those conversations always because silence on racism is harmful and simply perpetuates it, however when it comes to Disney films, you have to take many of these critiques with a grain of salt.

reply

[deleted]

#3 is a good point.

There is no objective reality... and that's Sucker Punch

reply