MovieChat Forums > Moana (2016) Discussion > Americans STOLE the Kingdom of Hawaii

Americans STOLE the Kingdom of Hawaii


And threw their queen in prison
Then America moved in and 90% of the natives died due to filthy colonist diseases.
Now they are an impoverished underclass and a minority in their own country. This happened less than 2 generations ago.

Give back the Kingdom of Hawaii

reply

Give it back to whom?

I hope you realize that Hawaiians today are much, much better off as a state in the United States than they would be as an independent nation.

reply

That is incorrect. They are far worse off. Poverty stricken. Obesity stricken. Mutilated culture. No control of their borders.
You'd make the same argument if Hitler won, because you lack imagination.
The Hawaiian Royal Family still exists.
This happened only 100 years ago. 2 generations.

reply

That is incorrect. They are far worse off


Nope.

Poverty stricken


If you think Hawaii is poverty stricken (it is not) compared that to most independent small island nations in the Pacific or Caribbean Sea, you'd be surprised. As a state, Hawaii gets the full protection and benefit of the US. Hawaii ranks 5th in the United States in median income with a poverty rate of 11.4%. Only three other states have lower poverty rates.

As for your claims:

Obesity stricken


Hawaii is the 9th least obese state in the United States. Meaning 41 other states suffer higher obesity rates. Kind of hard to claim obesity stricken then.

Mutilated culture.


Have you ever been to Hawaii, studied up on the, even talked with anyone from Hawaii? Because if you had, you'd see that their culture is far from mutilated.

No control of their borders.


You are correct in that Hawaii has no control over their borders, but neither does California, New Jersey, Tennessee, or 46 other states. They give that up in exchange for the benefit of being part of the United States.

You'd make the same argument if Hitler won, because you lack imagination


Ahh, the obligatory comparison of those who disagree with you to Hitler or Hitler supporters and the insults. How very immature and cliched of you.

And for the record, since you've been wrong on pretty much everything else, the Hawaiian queen Lili'uokalani was deposed in 1893, over 100 years ago. And most historians equate a generation to 25 years, meaning this was approximately 5 generations ago, not 2.

Two final thoughts, then I'll let you get back to trolling.

1) You never answered to whom Hawaii should be given back to.
2) What makes you think Hawaii is even relevant to this board? There are literally thousands of islands in the South Pacific, any of which could have served as the setting.




reply

Everything you said is wrong. I'm talking specifically about the NATIVE Hawaiians there.
Not the entire population of Hawaii, which is mostly non native Hawaiian you dumbass

Their religion is gone. Their culture is gone and replaced with cheap tourism culture. Their kingdom is gone. Their sovereignty is gone.
You're basically excusing occupation and creating a false reality where you claim it would be much worse if they were free. Umm zero evidence beyond your wishful dreaming. gtfo

Free Taiwan. Free Hawaii.

Given back to the Native Hawaiians and the Kingdom of Hawaii of course.

reply

Well, aside from moving the goalposts there, you did fine.

Regardless, you have no clue what you're talking about. I won't respond anymore, because it's clearly a waste of time, but I want you to know that everyone who reads your thread is laughing at you and your trolling. Hope it's worth it.

reply

I didn't move any goal posts. I was always talking about HAWAIIAN Hawaiians.
You are the ignoramous. Everything I stated is fact.

reply

I’m actually going to vouch for the statement about Hawaiians being poverty stricken and having a high obesity rate. As the OP said, s/he is talking about actual Hawaiians, not people who live in Hawaii. It’s a common misconception that they are the same thing, but there is a difference. Considering the fact that Asians are almost half of the population here, it makes sense that Hawaii has low obesity rate overall because Asians overall tend to be less likely to become obese. We are not talking about Asians, though. We are talking about Hawaiians.

I work with homeless and “at risk” clients here in Hawaii, and it’s true that my Native Hawaiian clients often live in the poorest areas of the island when compared to other groups. When you’re poor you eat the saltiest and fattiest foods because they are cheaper, so they do have issues with obesity. It’s a shame, but with colonization, the Native people tend to be the worse off. Just look at American Indians. Their poverty, suicide, domestic violence, drug abuse, and sexual assault rates are extremely high when compared to other groups. One of the most renowned Polynesian moves ever, “Once Were Warriors” depicts this in the Maori community. And any anthropologists or social scientist will tell you these are common issues among colonized people.

Hawaii’s poverty rate is reportedly low, but we also have the worst homeless population in the country. Worse than NYC! So, when I saw how highly we were ranked, I was shocked. If homelessness isn’t poverty, I don’t know what is. Also, the cost of living is so high that on Oahu a single adult can live in Section 8 home (aka low-income housing) if they make under $52,000. I repeat, you can be making $51k a year and still be eligible for rental assistance here. What does that say about our income situation down here?

reply

I don't know much about native Hawaiians but I wouldn't doubt it. Isn't it pretty much the same pattern wherever colonization took place over an indigenous people? And then of course hundreds of years later when the native people are a minute minority people try to validate or dismiss the atrocities that happened years ago by saying how wonderful everything is now. of course it's great if you had nothing to lose and everything to take.. but the past remains.

🐬 ma ink

reply

"And for the record, since you've been wrong on pretty much everything else, the Hawaiian queen Lili'uokalani was deposed in 1893, over 100 years ago. And most historians equate a generation to 25 years"
Technically, 20. But you were close (as are those historians), so thus we agree that the poster you quoted was an unedutated troll..

"And that's SHOWBIZ--kid."-Roxie Hart.
PROFILE PIC:Courtney Thorne-Smith.
MAGIC=Sarah Silverman.

reply

Pretty much this, mate. The way the US took Hawaii is unforgivable, the rate of advancement Hawaii achieved is perfectly fine. Hawaii is a first world state with modern technology and medicine, and they still have their culture in one piece. Sort of.


-Join us-
http://www.triond.com/rw/86365

reply

Thailand has modern technology AND independence.
Hawaii would too.
#ImperialistExcuses

reply

Siam avoided Colonization because neither British or French wanted to settle there.

The Kings, Mongkut, Chulalongkorn and Vajiravudh all changed the kingdom to be more European cultured than traditional Siam. They bought and traded for European technology and ideals.

Siam escaped annexing because no one wanted it. Hawaii couldn't avoid it because they were tricked and bought out by a businessman, who enforced his own government and tried to build his own country. That fell apart and the US annexed it.


-Join us-
http://www.triond.com/rw/86365

reply

Yep, imperialism is bad stuff! So is conquering places. There's no way anyone is giving anything back, though. The people that live there now have claimed it as home, just as those of many nations' decent have claimed the mainland and those in Japan have claimed it from the ancient civilization they conquered. It shouldn't happen, but it does.

reply

They can take it back. The people there will just become citizens of the Kingdom of Hawaii
America already gave the Phillipines back
UK gave India back

reply

It's not going to happen. If it happened there, then why not the whole of the United States? Why not Japan? I bet if you went into the history of most nations, there is a tale of conqueror and native people pushed aside. I doubt very much that you'd be happy giving back the land you call home.

reply

Hawaii happened very very recently. (Mexicans are retaking California lol)
but I'm not telling anyone to move
I'm talking about political autonomy only 👍

reply

Hawaii happened very very recently. (Mexicans are retaking California lol)
but I'm not telling anyone to move
I'm talking about political autonomy only 👍
Ok. The people living there now would have to want autonomy, first. Do they?

reply

There are tons of kingdom of Hawaii Nationalist groups.
China is in contact with them and said they will fully support them if America supports Taiwan.

reply

There are a lot of new residents in Hawaii, filipinos, Japanese, Americans, hispanics, some were born on the islands others just live there which is fine. They make a great living and many love the lifestyle and beaches its what attracts millions of people to the island every year. But it is the treatment of the locals or Native Hawaiians as 2nd class citizens that is the issue. Native Hawaiians are the islanders that can claim their heritage back to the original Polynesian that first discovered and settled in Hawaii over a thousand years ago. These were a proud and strong people that ruled over Hawaii for centuries. Then the wealthy Americans came and undermined and then overthrew their Queen, illegally taking the islands and claiming it as their own. Its funny how they preach how Hawaii is rich and successful, but like every colonised territory its the invaders enjoying the luxuries. The Natives are pushed to outskirts, unless some new resident or visitor wants some fake Lu'au or fire dance to entertain them. Sadly Hawaii's beautiful paradise is an illusion that can be bought by tourist and local business people. The People that the culture belongs too and have the true Aloha spirit, are left in the shadows to collect the scraps.

reply

There are a lot of new residents in Hawaii, filipinos, Japanese, Americans, hispanics, some were born on the islands others just live there which is fine. They make a great living and many love the lifestyle and beaches its what attracts millions of people to the island every year. But it is the treatment of the locals or Native Hawaiians as 2nd class citizens that is the issue. Native Hawaiians are the islanders that can claim their heritage back to the original Polynesian that first discovered and settled in Hawaii over a thousand years ago. These were a proud and strong people that ruled over Hawaii for centuries. Then the wealthy Americans came and undermined and then overthrew their Queen, illegally taking the islands and claiming it as their own. Its funny how they preach how Hawaii is rich and successful, but like every colonised territory its the invaders enjoying the luxuries. The Natives are pushed to outskirts, unless some new resident or visitor wants some fake Lu'au or fire dance to entertain them. Sadly Hawaii's beautiful paradise is an illusion that can be bought by tourist and local business people. The People that the culture belongs too and have the true Aloha spirit, are left in the shadows to collect the scraps.
Exactly.

reply

You do realize Hawaii long term is better off and the people there have a future? They are even economically better off then some other islands. But I admit I do not agree with the things the European colonist did.

reply

Lol, ask the Native Hawaiians if they are better off. The arrogance of someone to say that the island is better, because the whites, filipinos and other Haoles are living the good life. You completely miss the point of my earlier comment.

My island of Samoa, was ruled over by the Germans, British, and New Zealand, our people were treated like 2nd class citizens in our own island. The Samoan culture and traditions were frowned upon by the Europeans and restricted. In June 1962 Samoa finally achieved its independence. Today our people flourish, the economy is doing well, and our culture and traditions remain strong. I believe this could be the same for the Hawaiians, but there is no way the greedy Americans are gonna let go of their money pit. Like you said its better of for YOU in the long term and will get even better after this Moana movie. Not for the Native Hawaiians tho, buts that's just a necessary evil that some will lose out i.e always the Natives.

reply

My island of Samoa, was ruled over by the Germans, British, and New Zealand, our people were treated like 2nd class citizens in our own island. The Samoan culture and traditions were frowned upon by the Europeans and restricted. In June 1962 Samoa finally achieved its independence. Today our people flourish, the economy is doing well, and our culture and traditions remain strong. I believe this could be the same for the Hawaiians, but there is no way the greedy Americans are gonna let go of their money pit. Like you said its better of for YOU in the long term and will get even better after this Moana movie. Not for the Native Hawaiians tho, buts that's just a necessary evil that some will lose out i.e always the Natives.


In what way is the Samoan economy doing well? The GDP, GDP growth, and deficit are among the worst in the world (203rd, 198th, and 180th, respectively). Based on the CIA world factbook.

reply

CIA = Globalists. What do you expect them to say?
We already saw how they rigged polls this election.

reply

Unless you can show me different results from a reputable site, then those facts stand. Crying "rigged" at whatever disagrees with what you wanted to happen, whether it's an election or an economy's statistics, just shows your immaturity and lack of ability to back up what you say with any kind of facts. Really? We saw how they rigged polls this election? Please, show me how the rigged the polls.

reply

They are not facts. You're just throwing out random numbers.
And Hillary was projected with a 99% chance of victory. Polls = Propaganda. Nothing more.

reply

They are not facts. You're just throwing out random numbers.
And Hillary was projected with a 99% chance of victory. Polls = Propaganda. Nothing more.


I'm not just throwing out random numbers. I looked them up on the internet, found them on a website that I've used many times before and has never been erroneous, posted them here and referenced my source. If you want to prove them wrong, go ahead. But just saying they're falsified with no proof whatsoever isn't going to get us anywhere.

And I did misread your post, I apologize. I thought you were referencing voting being rigged, not the polls. I agree, the polls were clearly rigged, as they were beyond incorrect.

reply

Hmmmm wth is the CIA global factbook, am i supposed to be impressed. Your talking about an agency whos job is too spy on other countries, gather intel, and then depending on the threat to America (mostly unreal) they organise assasinations, destabilise governments, bring on civil wars etc. The CIA is the big brother of the FBI and they are just as adept at feeding misinformation whether thru media outlets or their websites as gathering relevant info for themselves. Im surprised u used the CIA site as a reference, you're obviously easily impressed. Better to use a financial website that specialises in international economies.

BTW i didnt say Samoa had a great economy but we do well to survive in such a competitive world market. I mean look at the EU they're basically in self destruct mode. Not too mention america hving the greatest dept on the planet, and they still havent fully recovered frm their recession. Do u know that most of ur debt is owed to China, not good owing money to the 2nd largest economy on the planet.

reply

Hmmmm wth is the CIA global factbook, am i supposed to be impressed. Your talking about an agency whos job is too spy on other countries, gather intel, and then depending on the threat to America (mostly unreal) they organise assasinations, destabilise governments, bring on civil wars etc. The CIA is the big brother of the FBI and they are just as adept at feeding misinformation whether thru media outlets or their websites as gathering relevant info for themselves. Im surprised u used the CIA site as a reference, you're obviously easily impressed. Better to use a financial website that specialises in international economies.


No, you're not supposed to be "impressed", you're supposed to either accept the facts, or use a reputable site to prove they aren't facts. You've done neither. You just cry "bogus" and "rigged", without offering any proof of it. That is the site I found that offers a lot of economical information on countries, and I've used it many times before and never found any errors, so I will continue to use it until someone actually proves it to be erroneous, not just because someone says "Oh, CIA, clearly false duh lol".

BTW i didnt say Samoa had a great economy but we do well to survive in such a competitive world market. I mean look at the EU they're basically in self destruct mode. Not too mention america hving the greatest dept on the planet, and they still havent fully recovered frm their recession. Do u know that most of ur debt is owed to China, not good owing money to the 2nd largest economy on the planet.


You didn't use the word great, no, but you did say it's flourishing and the economy is doing well. Yes, and China owes debt to us as well. Every country has debt. Ours is the largest because our economy is the largest as well. But when you look at the debt as a percentage compared to our GDP, it's only about -4%, which would be 73rd in the world. Not amazing, but not terrible either. And that's with the debt skyrocketing recently. We'll see if things change with the change in our leaders.

reply

Can u listen to yourself, u like to quote all these stats about my island and then make light of the stats concerning yours.

The population of samoa is around 200,000 and our economy is tiny. Samoa has one of the smallest economies on the planet so the figures u quote are not surprising. You say we're about 200 or something in economies, we're prob the 230 smallest economy on the planet too lol. Our lifestyle is very laid bck, we dont require alot of money, we dont need flash cars an and all that bs.

America is a great country, but it is drowning in debt. Last i checked it was 19 trillion and 1.7 trillion of that is owed to China. U seem to make light of it, but the threat of another full recession is at your doorstep. The fact is the corrupt banks, corporates and politicians that lead u to this point are still in power. They were not punished for their crimes, and are still bleeding your country dry. You do realise that america housing bubble implosion caused a global recession right. Many counties still havent recovered fully.

You now have a president that represents the very corporate world that is ruining your country. He has no political experience, has already insulted women, war veterans and hard working immigrants. I mean he hasn't even been sworn into office yet and hes insulted and caused friction with China. Sadly you are in denial of where your economy and country stands at the moment. I pray that america can survive a trump and republican controlled government. America and the rest of the free world depends on it.

reply

Disagree about your last paragraph.
Trump is fighting against the Globalists. All of the corrupt corporations backed Hillary and fought against Trump.
Please ignore our lying mainstream media Fake News.
He only fights back against people who have insulted him first. He's already cancelled WW3, smoothing over relations with Russia, Phillipines, and saved 30,000 jobs from moving over seas. As for the China thing, he just accepted a congrats call from Taiwan. Good. He shouldn't follow the wishes of the corrupt Communist Chinese Party.
Free Taiwan. Free Hawaii.

reply

Again, debt is going to be higher for all big economies. If you look at debt as a number, all the big economies are going to look bad. You have to look at percentages. Just like I could make your work force look pathetic if I compared how many people are working in your country to how many people are working in America. That's a terrible comparison, because your country is much less populated. So you look at percentage.

We're drowning in debt just like other large economies are drowning in debt. The only countries that have a surplus are very small countries. Granted, it doesn't help that our current president has spent 8 years throwing money we don't have at programs we don't need. But even before that and before the recession, we still had large debt. That's just how the economy works.

No, we don't have that president yet. I can't wait for when we do, though. He's never insulted hard working LEGAL immigrants. Illegal immigrants are killing our economy, getting paid a pay check (taking money out of the economy) and then sending it to their families back in Mexico (not putting the money back in the economy). That murders an economy because money is disappearing. I'm not in denial. We're standing in decent position despite how awful the government has limited spending in recent years, and we're FINALLY looking at a future where the right people are in power in every branch of the government to start building the economy back to where it needs to be.

reply

[deleted]

o realize Hawaii long term is better off and the people there have a future?
Factually incorrect. Also a guess
Japan is an island and they're doing great. Island does not = bad unless colonized.

reply

Japan is an island and they're doing great. Island does not = bad unless colonized.
Japan was colonized by the people we now recognize as "Japanese". The people who were living there first were pushed to the margins, as the other poster described of native Hawaiians. Not saying it's right, just saying it happens and all over the place. There are still living decedents of the original peoples who occupied the Japanese islands.

reply

The Japanese largely absorbed them. And that was thousands of years ago.
Not 100 like Hawaii. It's funny how you can't point to the Hawaiian people doing this so you go pick a random irrelevant place to justify your bigotry

reply

It's funny how you can't point to the Hawaiian people doing this so you go pick a random irrelevant place to justify your bigotry
What bigotry? Where did I display that? And what do you mean I "can't point to Hawaiian people doing this..." doing what?

reply

You brought up Japan.
Hawaiians never took over a place. Hawaii was empty.
Keep up the conversation, bird

reply

Yes, I brought up Japan in response to what you said about islands. Nowhere did I ever say that imperialism and conquering are right. But since you're going to attempt to bully me by calling me names and putting words in my mouth, the conversation IS over.

reply

And Japan is irrelevant because Native Hawaiians are not Japanese.
What bullying? Lmao. Nice job running away because you lose the argument. Calling you a bird is calling you a name? Um your avatar is a bird.
#Dumb

reply

Japan is not irrelevant. You said Japan is doing great even though they are an island, but that counters your original argument because the people doing great in Japan are the ones who colonized it. The people who are doing great in Hawaii are again the people that colonized it. So you saying Japan is doing great as an island is no different than the poster who said Hawaii is doing great.

reply

You made the racist argument that Islanders can't do great on there own, which is why I brought up Japan.
Keep up with the conversation. Also the Ainu didn't populate all of the islands. Many were first inhabited by the Japanese.
Also how about the U.K.? They are an island.

reply

You made the racist argument that Islanders can't do great on there own, which is why I brought up Japan.
Keep up with the conversation. Also the Ainu didn't populate all of the islands. Many were first inhabited by the Japanese.
Also how about the U.K.? They are an island.


I actually didn't make any "racist" argument, nor did I say anything about islanders not being able to do great on their own. That was OhNooos. I just responded in the middle of the discussion. Though, I did decide to look up Japanese colonization and read up on it to see if OhNooos's reference to it being colonized was correct, and it was not. Japan is apparently one of the few islands to never be colonized, so I'll concede that point to you.

reply

You two need to get IMDb picture icons
I started mixing you two up in this thread haha

reply

I actually didn't make any "racist" argument, nor did I say anything about islanders not being able to do great on their own. That was OhNooos. I just responded in the middle of the discussion. Though, I did decide to look up Japanese colonization and read up on it to see if OhNooos's reference to it being colonized was correct, and it was not. Japan is apparently one of the few islands to never be colonized, so I'll concede that point to you.
I never said anything about the islanders not being able to do great on their own.

And yes, Japan was colonized. The original people were called the Ainu. I first became aware of them in an news magazine article decades ago. I was able to find this online, although it claims that the modern Japanese had settled the area in the 15th century, which is not as long ago as I thought and far sooner than the "thousands of years ago" that carrot claimed.

https://heritageofjapan.wordpress.com/just-what-was-so-amazing-about-jomon-japan/1-temp-from-africa-to-east-asia-the-tale-of-migration-and-origins-emerges-from-our-mitochondria-dna/origins-of-the-jomon-jomon-connections-with-the-continent-and-with-todays-japanese/who-are-the-ainu-people/

reply

The Japanese largely absorbed them. And that was thousands of years ago.
Not 100 like Hawaii. It's funny how you can't point to the Hawaiian people doing this so you go pick a random irrelevant place to justify your bigotry


So as long as it's long enough ago, it makes it alright? So it's wrong what happened now, but in 1000 years, it will be alright that it happened? Seems hypocritical. OhNooos was consistent in saying that it's wrong in every case.

reply

Never said it was right. But what does Japan have to do with Hawaii?
Are you retarded?

reply

No, I am not retarded. You implied it was fine because it was thousands of years ago, while Hawaii was more recent. Whether recently or a long time ago, nothing changes. What does Japan have to do with Hawaii? They are similar in situations. Japan was an island once owned by the indigenous people, but then colonized, and the people that colonized it flourished and turned it into what it is today.. Hawaii is the exact same, just years later.

reply

Time does matter. If a nation stole something 1,000 years ago or if they stole something 1 day ago it's a big difference, jackass.
No the situations are not remotely similar. Ainu didn't even inhabit all of the islands. Japan did not culturally genocide and overthrow their governments either. They just settled there also and the societies merged. Similar to the Malays and the and the earlier tribes in the Phillipines.

reply