MovieChat Forums > Moana (2016) Discussion > What annoyed me about it

What annoyed me about it


Was that stupid chicken, you can always see in Disney movies where a Disney exc has interfered with a movie

Usually it's the awful outta place Jokes or the inclusion of an animal sidekick

The chicken was Clearly only there for comedic relief which I don't know why since Maui and Moana and some fun back and forward

It's annoying, almost every Disney movie has one and they're only added for the toy sales

Which is why I'm glad the pig didn't have much of a role which is what I wasn't expecting I could see that pig being sold as the latest new cuddly toy

And it is the same with baby Moana it was only added for the sake of having a toy for toddlers

Disney movies are really
Only just really long kids toys adverts

reply

Just Disney, huh? DreamWorks and Illumination aren't "guilty" of this offense at all, I guess.

reply

Where did the OP mention anything about dreamworks or illumination?

reply

He didn't, but the point was he's making it sound like only Disney is guilty of doing it. I don't really have a problem with Comic Relief characters, as long as they are funny, and I found the chicken not too annoying in this.

reply

Bingo!

reply

He didn't, but he didn't need to. The point obviously went right over your head there.

reply

I'm now confused. You said it was only there for comic relief, then you said it was only there for toy sales. Which is it? Clearly, it has more than on purpose...

As for me, I enjoyed the chicken and thought it was hilarious. And no, baby Moana was not added just for having a toy for toddlers. Baby Moana was there so she could get chosen by the ocean, which was a major part in the movie. Seriously, did you even watch the movie?

reply

The chicken was hilarious. Im glad they put him in there.

reply