I think that your view on the meaning of dreams is too literal and your view on the series is too metaphorical.
Dream interpretation is
entirely subjective. While there are archetypes that extend across cultures, your bird, or land, or bottle cap is not
someone else's bird, or land, or bottle cap. Your examples of land or air do not mean the same thing to me by a long shot. There cannot be a realistic or accurate "consensus" of dream symbols for this reason.
Strictly speaking, Jungian archetypes refer to unclear underlying forms or the archetypes-as-such from which emerge images and motifs such as the mother, the child, the trickster, and the flood among others. It is history, culture and personal context that shape these manifest representations thereby giving them their specific content.
{
Wikipedia Jungian Archetypes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungian_archetypes }
Likewise, interpretation of metaphors is also very subjective, but in literary tradition, the
observer, (as I've identified Romeo to be) is a
'voice'. For example, when a writer begins to tell a story, she/he has to decide what 'voice' will tell the story which will establish the point of view -- will it be the
omniscient voice; the one who knows what all the characters are doing, thinking, etc.? Or will it be a
narrating voice? Will the narrator be the main character, telling his own story? Or will the narrator be a friend/relative/etc. who tells the story about the main character? Or will there be several points of view? We're getting into the fundamentals of writing here, but it's important that the writer establish this from the very beginning. Each voice has its limitations and its abilities. The same is true in film/TV.
Trust me, the writers of F&B thought long and hard about the symbolism of the characters because they tell a deeper story, especially someone like Romeo, who is an observer, both in character and archetypally.
I do not think that I've been 'too metaphorical' in interpreting Romeo at all. In fact, I think I've been very simplistic.
The story works without going into symbolism so viewers can be as literal as they want.
(But it's not nearly as fun...;-))
God made man because he loves stories. —Rabbi Nachman
reply
share