MovieChat Forums > The Walk (2015) Discussion > Wow that was some HEAVY narration...

Wow that was some HEAVY narration...


For the first 10 to 20 minutes the narration was getting annoying, by the end, I wanted to yell "we can see that there are two New York police officers on the building" you don't need to TELL us that there were now "two New York police officers on the building".

I got so accustomed to the narration that when the wheel came off the cart (when they got out of the elevator onto the 100th floor), I expected JGL to either tell us that "the wheel came off the cart" or cut to a shot of him on the Statue of Liberty telling us that "at this point, the wheel came off the cart".

"The officer left his phone on the chair"
-- shot of officer's phone on the chair.

"The cops were still looking around while we were sitting on the metal beam"
-- the cops can be heard looking around while the characters are seen sitting on the metal beam.

Even the scene where the cop interrogates them in the van, it was clear the officer was suspicious. The character didn't need to turn to JGL and tell him that "that cop was suspicious".

Also, at the end, we pretty much knew that there would be something about the 'last 3 steps'...but of course, it had to cut to JGL telling us that this was now "the last 3 steps".

It could've easily cut back to the first time JGL almost falls after he thinks the last 3 steps are easy.

I thought one of the rules of story-telling was 'show don't tell' and that narration is generally frowned upon...(not always, but sometimes)...

I have never seen it used to such an extent as in this film.

It had to have been some kind of 'test audience' suggestion or something because how can professional film makers allow such heavy narration into such a big film??

reply

Have you seen The Martian?

Has him talking to himself every step of the way. Not meant to be narration because it's really happening.
But really it is just narration of his thoughts. Who is he speaking to with such charisma? It make very little sense the way he is acting like he's on a reality show trying to entertain an audience.

I didn't mind the narration that was meant to be narration in The Walk.
It led to my favorite moment in film for last year. The "Forever" tribute to the towers.
So Great!

I mostly cum at night, mostly.

reply

Sometimes narration is essential. In this case I just wanted him to shut up. It's lazy story telling and dumbing down of audiences to need someone to talk all the way through a movie

reply

I really enjoyed the narration. I thought that was a huge part of the charm of the film. So even though you didn't like it, maybe you can feel better knowing others liked it?

reply

I did too. The OP gives several good examples from the film that probably were, indeed, overkill. But you use the word "charm" and the narration is such an essential element in providing this to the story.

Much of the narration allows us to hear what Pettit is actually thinking at certain times, so I'm not sure how his unique voice could be presented without it.

The film has been criticized for not presenting a full picture of what motivated Pettit, and maybe that's partially true. But, having seen the documentary, I would say that the dramatization certainly got across Pettit's romanticism, playful enthusiasm, showmanship and wonder of America. The narration was a big part of all that.

reply

Yet, you probably rave about "Forrest Gump", which does the same thing though it comes across as a comedy, unlike "The Walk".

By the way: The narration in "The Walk" reminds me of the documentary, not "FG".



(W)hat are we without our dreams?
Making sure our fantasies
Do not overpower our realities. ~ RC

reply

Yet, you probably rave about "Forrest Gump",


Never seen 'Forest Gump'.

Does Tom Hanks narrate everything he does though in that film? i.e. "I was sitting on a park bench" -- show Tom Hanks sitting on a park bench?

I'm not trying to be funny I'm genuinely asking.

reply

It wasn't 'narration' that was the problem in this film for me, it was DESCRIBING EXACTLY what was seen on the screen.

It seemed odd/pointless and I don't understand. He wasn't giving insights etc, he was describing what was happening in the scene/s.

reply

It's like that throughout the film. He does something then repeats what happens, including the dialogue~in that extremely irritating voice Hanks uses (obviously stolen from a much-earlier performance by his brother). I managed to get through it once. Never again!

However, I do like the narration in "The Walk" because it reminds me of the documentary. I do wish they had included the bridge walk in Australia instead of leaping from Notre Dame to the towers.

I say this about "Forrest Gump": When we were watching it, my mother asked, "Is this supposed to be a comedy?" That's what most of it seems like. Then, there's the gimmick of mixing old film footage with FG and believing that a mentally challenged man could do what he did.



(W)hat are we without our dreams?
Making sure our fantasies
Do not overpower our realities. ~ RC

reply

The main problem here is not the narration but JGs really bad accent blaring in your head!

reply