MovieChat Forums > X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) Discussion > not bad like people claim it is

not bad like people claim it is

posted 8 months ago by UMAD (655)
5 replies | jump to latest

is it as good as DOFP and FC? probably not....

is it a bad movie? hell no!!!!!

if you call this a bad movie but think avengers infinity wars and endgames which are clusterfucks are good thats only proving you are an mcutard who dont know shit about comic book movies

apocalypse was much more memorable then thanos and his "lets destroy half of everything" nonsense.

deal with it mcutards. nobody wants the x-men in the mcu aside from mcutards pieces of shit

the only reason why people bash this movie is because they claim apocalypse was nerfed. but then again. this is more about fox which has a formula of one movie for each arc.

so you cant really blame fox for not making it a 2 parter because x-men was never about being long ass cinematic universe.

also. because x-men basically have a 1 movie formula its more appealing to casuals while mcu is a huge clusterfuck where everything are tie-ins and you constantly need to watch everything to understand things.

mcu is trash. all of it. deal with it mcutards

[–] SemiAnimus (2353) 8 months ago

It's biggest fault was wasting the huge potential of Apocalypse, one of the best villains in the X-Men comics. It wasn't horrible though, just forgettable and mediocre.

[–] UMAD (655) 8 months ago

you cant do much in one movie. but this is fox formula. not the actual movie

[–] mechajutaro (2788) 8 months ago

"not bad like people claim it is"

This one is a childbirth that brings forth The Elephant Man, compared to the stillbirth that was Dark Phoenix

[–] Creamofdacrop884 (1684) 8 months ago

It's not terrible, but it's not that good either.

[–] UMAD (655) 8 months ago

same as mcu shitstains that mcutards like yourself praise