MovieChat Forums > Mr. McMahon (2024) Discussion > What I Learned From Watching The Mr. McM...

What I Learned From Watching The Mr. McMahon Documentary


The main thing i took away was that Vince McMahon has two personalities:

His first personality, or "Personality A"
1. The on-stage "character" and in-ring persona of McMahon: The ruthless businessman and chief executive of wrestling entertainment whom everyone hates and would stop at nothing to obtain power and wealth. Remember, this is a "character", and is entirely fictional with no basis in reality whatsoever.

His second personality, or "Personality B"
2. The off stage, real-life Vince McMahon: The ruthless businessman and chief executive of wrestling entertainment whom everyone hates and would stop at nothing and step over anyone to obtain power and wealth.

reply

I am not sure I completely agree... sure there are similarities between the 2... but you have got to have some humor/bright side to create such a buffoon as the Mr. McMahon wrestling character...

I still think most of the wrestlers have a huge amount of respect og Vince and what he created... but those sexual accusations doesn't make him look good and exposes a dark side which is not pretty and hopefully he gets thrown in jail if just a little amount of it is true...

And I am sure that business wise he is as ruthless as they come... which usually leaves some casualties a long the way...

reply

"I still think most of the wrestlers have a huge amount of respect og Vince and what he created"

That's only because they HAD to go to Vince, after WCW folded. WWE Basically WAS professional wrestling at that time apart from TNA and their 6-sided ring nonsense. No one had a choice.

So now they all thank Vince, for getting them into the wrestling business. If it wasn't Vince in charge , it would have been someone else. It's a job. Everyone's replaceable at the end of the day.

Anyone could do Vince McMahon's job. Make up fake wrestling feuds and scripts? A 6 year old could do that. It literally takes no mental capacity, you don't even need to know how to write scripts. You don't even need to know how to WRITE.
Most of the fights are worked out between the wreslers, anyway. They decide whos gonna win, where all the falls are, whos gonna take what fall when, and how to work the crowd. It's all the wrestlers who actually do all the work, create the characters, and make the promos. Vince McMahon just decides when and how he's gonna screw them over.

reply

I am not saying it takes a accomplished writer to do these storylines... and yes it is decided who wins that is a given... But somehow Vince did end up beating every competitor who tried to challenge WWF/WWE...

The Undertaker for example said he would take a bullit for Vince... if that is not respect I don't know what is...

reply

Yes, but only by copying WCW... Poaching their stars, arguably copying their 'attitude era' from what WCW was doing at the time. Both of them were copying / immitating eachother during the Monday Night Wars.

It was just a matter of who could rip the other off the most, and steal eachother's ideas. Which Vince ended up being the best at. He also blatantly ripped off ECW with all the blood and hardcore matches they brought in to WWF. Even bringing ECW characters on like Cactus Jack and Terry Funk to revive their ECW acts. By the time you get to the Attitude Era, WWF was just taking old ideas that had already been done from ECW and WCW and repeating/reusing them just on a bigger stage.

reply

You can spin it however you like... But Vince won... so even if he copied them he apparently did it better... I stopped watching wrestling in the early 90ties so never experienced up close when WCW began to challange WWF.

reply

Buying out your competition and shutting them down is a pretty weak definition of winning. At least if your metric is who did it better. Pro wrestling has been on the decline ever since. There was some initial excitement with the invasion angle, but that quickly went away once people realized they were just going to trash the other league to put over wwe talent.

reply

Again I haven't really watched wrestling since the early 90ties... but if we can trust the documentary then WWF/WWE had again overtaken WCW in the ratings when they offered Vince to buy WCW, so if that is true... he did beat them in the ratings before buying them...

reply

It's WWE having no competition that makes it stale . They have no other major Wrestling promotions to compete with , so they don't really have to try to create inventive stories, now that they basically have a monopoly over the industry.

reply

Respect and fear are too different things.

This doc was made while he was still the boss. That's why I think not every employee or former was fully honest.

reply

That very well might be the case...

But for example it is pretty extreme to say you would take a bullit for someone... The Undertaker could have said a lot of things that would still be positive and respectful about Vince... that is a strong statement...

But I am sure some of the people interviewed might literally fear Vince... he is an imposing character

reply