Hate that out of date cheap horror tactic, I know no real animal was killed but c'mon those scenes always suck the air out of everything
sharei agree. i don't even know what the purpose is for that horrible scene. it has a tacky execution and definitely worthless.
shareIt was cheap. As was the surprise death of the GF. Didn't make sense at all.
shareYou guys are vaginas.
shareThank you for the only intelligent comment in this thread.
shareCalling people vaginas is not an insult. As the great Betty White once said “Why do people say 'grow some balls'? Balls are weak and sensitive. If you wanna be tough, grow a vagina. Those things can take a pounding.”
share"You guys are vaginas."
LOLOL!
What's wrong with these ridiculous people? Getting angry over the death of an animal in a work of fiction?
It's just more of the current mindless cultural influence to turn everyone into overly sensitive pansies, disturbed and offended when the wind blows the wrong way.
Yet, the death of human beings portrayed in a fictional sense doesn't trigger their delicate sensibilities?
GTFO, you comical and ignorant noobs!
I say...MORE animal death in films. MORE violence. More fictional depictions of homicidal mayhem.
And speaking of...can you imagine how chronically butthurt these sissies would be if a transgendered person was the victim of a murder in a film?
A shame these boards are ending soon. I'd have loved to come here and read posts when and if that ever happens. Most likely though, it wont. Most any film maker would be too frightened of the repercussions to show anything like that in a film. There would be protests from the SJW's.
I thought that was pointless too. Don't witches like cats?
shareYes it was totally uncalled for, I mean how the hell did the cat or girlfriend in any way tortured or harmed the witch? Also, those deaths did nothing for the story, it was just for the sake of shock.
Other than that, this was a really good scary horror movie.
I don't know about the cat, but the girlfriend wasn't killed. Her death was just a hallucination brought on by the witch. She never came back too the house that night. If you watch the ending carefully, the police only remove two body bags from the house. This is also very subtle, but all of the girlfriend's blood that Austin got on himself disappeared after he died, further showing her death was just a hallucination.
shareI did not notice that. But I was wondering why would his girlfriend even get back at that place in the middle of the night and not tell anything or call them by names. It looked silly. It could be that she was never there, though it would help if we have seen her alive and well at the end. But we didn't.
shareI thought at first she should have shown up at the end, but watching the film a second time I'm glad they made it more subtle. Since she decided not to come back later that night, there wasn't any reason for her to show up in the morning, either.
shareThe cat hissed/growled at her corpse when she was wheeled in. It could sense her threat. I normally agree with this point of view as animal death tends to be gratuitous or lazy shock factor BUT it made sense here. ALSO, given that there is more evidence to suggest that the girlfriend did not die than did, it's fair to assume the cat did not actually die too.
share