London is populated almost exclusively with white people, the roads are free of traffic and if you want to go to St. Pancras station you just park outside.
shareThat's nothing compared to what was supposed to pass for times square.
sharewrlord2001 you really are being picky if you think that didn't resemble New York's Times Square. It looked just fine.
shareThat's nothing compared to what was supposed to pass for times square.
London is populated almost exclusively with white people
"populated with white people', sure, but you're including a lot of third-world MUSLIMS, aren't you??
Life is a journey not a destination. Fear nothing.
Perhaps London streets have a lot more vehicle traffic now; I haven't been back for some years. However, when I was there, I was struck by just how empty of cars they were. You could jaywalk almost at will, and I stood in the middle of the mall to get a good shot of Admiralty Arch.
I found the same thing in Paris. I couldn't figure out why Blvd. St. Michel was 6 lanes. Every time I saw it - which was fairly often as my hotel was nearby - 2 lanes would have sufficed. Again...a long time since I've been there.
I also found that the average person had no idea where anything was geographically. All directions given were made by way of referencing the underground.
When were you there, 1907? are you the Highlander?
The whole depiction of London was travelogue. St Pancras was presumably chosen because it was recently renovated for Eurostar connections to Paris. Only "Classy" parts of London are shown. The Photographer lady drives a Mini (of course). The only thing missing to make this resemble an Ealing comedy was a bobby on the beat perhaps.
share