ok so does jlo show nudity in this or not?
anything?
shareNo, the closest you'll get is the male with his hands on her breasts to cover her nipples, and there is only one shot of that in the one scene, that they also use in a flashback, but it's exactly the same footage.
Many people saw this due to her being in the film, and it probably would have been smarter to draw it out more with scenes of her doing Yoga and a "how did I get drenched in water with these tight clothes on?"
Neither of those suggestions require any nudity, but they would have sold the plot more if she was more tempting.
If You're Failing to Plan,
You're Planning to Fail.
what did you mean by her doing yoga and "how did I get drenched in water with these tight clothes on?" scenes?
yeah, this movie was a huge disappointment and is totally unnecessary and pointless. I mean, what does she gain from it? it's a crappy, b movie and she doesn't show any nudity so there is no reason to watch it for anything. and by the way I think it's laughable and so wrong how the guy is covering her nipples with his hands. talk about unrealistic because I know why they did that, they did that only to not show her boobs because it's a PG-13 rated movie or only because she didn't want to show her boobs in this below average movie. they didn't do it because it was realistic. when having sex with a woman her boobs if exposed you see, so they audience should see her boobs to make the scene realistic. her showing her boobs would've at least made this movie watchable and have a point for seeing it.
it's a PG-13 rated movie...R, perhaps? share
I get your point but I surely grab a handful or mouthful when bumping uglies.. I do admire them as well but to say it's unrealistic to grab fun bags is well inexperienced or a damn shame!
share