MovieChat Forums > The Diary of a Teenage Girl (2015) Discussion > The producers should be charged with chi...

The producers should be charged with child pornography!


This was the most horrible movie I've seen, probably in my life, 102 minutes of child abuse with barely a whisper about it being wrong. The nude scenes with a 15-year-old naked in bed with a grown, naked man on top of her, multiple times, I'm sure count as child pornography, but get away it by being part of a "major motion picture." I truly think the producers should be charged with producing and distributing child pornography.

If you thought this was a horrible movie, a glossing over, a whitewashing of child abuse, you might want to look at the comment I left, headed "Horrible, horrible."

It will take some time to put this horrible movie out of my mind. It's like I saw multiple instances of child abuse, but I can't even report them to the police.

reply

The actress is 24.

reply

While that may be true, but I think it's the idea of what the film is showing. I think it's fair to note Hollywood is gradually trying to get us more comfortable with the notion of teen girls/teen boys with adult men/women because that is life and life imitates art. I don't find it offensive at all showing teen girls naked especially where 16 is the age of consent in many US states with the fight to go younger, in the same vein homosexual marriages were hard fought and won. Expect this to happen too with ages of consent. It will be lowered, mostly because of a overwhelming prison population where killers are being stationed with adult men who received consent from the so-called minor. Prisons need to only be for those who commit the most heinous of crimes, not for who chooses to sleep with who.

reply

Well, as someone said the actress is in her twenties. If a FICTIONAL movie shows someone getting killed, would you charge the producers with murder? People really need to figure out the difference between fiction and reality. Sheesh!

Teenagers do have sex and they sometimes have sex with older adults. I don't morally approve of it, but there are far better things to get upset about.

"Let be be finale of seem/ The only emperor is the Emperor of Ice Cream"

reply

[deleted]

I was about to start a thread whose title be "How is this film legal?" as obscenity laws in some countries prohibit even the fictional expression or portrayal of underage sex. But I think the US code has a scientific, artistic, medical, educational exemption clause.

Notwithstanding, "child" is a misnomer as everyone is a child of a parent and "youth" or "minor" or simply "underaged" should be the term. The only abuse here is legal and verbal abuse from you and the state.

I'll bet you're guilty of sexual abuse of a minor yourself, a felony, as 1USC1 implicates you as the offender when you first masturbated.

In the US the peak (mode) age of sex offenders is 14, which means the left shoulder includes antepubescents; that and the average first masturbation age disprove the perniciose urban legend and lige that kids don't understand sex. It's you who abuse kids when you treat them as stupid subhuman property and try to vilify a rewarding and meaningful fact of life as sexual contact. The laws or the state need to be overthrown.

In your review several times you call the adult the abuser when the adult didn't initiate most of the relationship. You must be retarded, sexually, socially, and mentally, if you think that everyone of a certain age doesn't or can't understand something that everyone of a greater age does. Minors do make the first move whether on their age peers or with adults and you'd call any adult that goes along the abuser, and ignore the minor's responsibility. You should be disgusted at your ignorant ageist hate. Maybe if all "adults", if there were such a thing, were dead then nobody could take the blame for anything? Or would you admit that you were kept ignorant for most of your early life not because of any inherent mental limitation of yours but that your close ones kept you so for some perpetual breeders' agenda?

reply

No children were shown naked or having simulated sex. The actress is in her 20s.

reply

Personally, that was what made me love the movie. Not as good as Pretty Baby, but still darn nice.


--------------------------------
dies ist meine unterschrift

reply

Pretty Baby shocked me more, but I found this one to be more arousing tbh. I like a woman that's aggressive and in charge.

reply

Right after your surgeon being charged for CLEARLY giving you a lobotomy.

reply