Walrus suit
I may be overthinking this… but why not, eh?
I can’t quite work out why the freak Howard cut Wallace’s legs off? He must have had plenty of bones to make tusks out of and there are other ways to reduce the prisoner’s mobility pre- and post- suit wearing.
Was Wallace inside the suit of human skin or was it somehow sewn onto him? It seemed very ‘big’ and I’m not sure if the front legs were his arms or not (but then how could they be when his arms were sewn onto his body?!) ….but then his head/face seemed to be seamlessly part of it.
How anyone would be able to survive all that surgery performed by an amateur, especially when it involved amputation and somehow fixing bone teeth into your face?!
Why didn’t they get Wallace out of the walrus suit and try to ‘fix’ him?! I mean the whole film was pretty wacky but the ending was just stupid.
The walrus suit remained the same all the time, even though it was getting wet (and don’t even get me started on Wallace’s toilet needs!) - still with bloody sutures and without rotting.
At least in other similar horror things skinned skin is shown to go ‘off’ or leatherise or people being formed into other ‘things’ don’t cope and die from shock or infection etc.