It was enjoyable for what it was but it felt like they just gave up making the movie half way through and just meandered to a finish.
shareyeah the outback started the decline there were funny gags still but story wise in went to *beep*
shareI felt after the waterpark the movie just gave up and sort of drifted to a conclusion. Jay meets Jayne and they don't even have a proper conversation she just rejects him. The generic jock (hippy this time?) had as much depth as every single previous jock we've seen. The first movie felt like a natural conclusion to their stories and this just felt like a cash grab.
shareI disagree, this was way better than the first.
shareI agree with stevenmcginger. The first film felt more episodic, like an extended version of the TV show whereas this film had a narrative arc that was maintained through the film.
This was filled with more jokes and although they didn't all hit there were more than enough to make this funnier than the first film.
I think this was much better than the 1st one. It had much better lines.
shareI thought this was way better than the first - funnier gags and better story (the first one felt like it was just trying to be like the tv show - this one felt like an actual movie).
shareI liked this film but it wasn't as good as the first one, some of the humour seemed a bit off in places.
Obviously you're not a golfer
No Where near as good as the first. I just think it was a cash cow as they knew all us fans would see it regardless. I thought the cast even seemed uninterested. Sad :(
shareA bit hit and miss, some great gross out scenes though.
I expected more of the same, so I was quite content.
I wrote a review if you're interested:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3097204/reviews-38
http://www.hawkensian.com/
I found it better than the first and more funnier, surprised there was only one sex scene in it though.
share