This "movie" was mostly penis shots, and the woman's vagoo was a trainwreck. I think it was made for gay dudes or something. Porn should have decently pretty girls (definitely more than one ugly one) and I don't want to see the man's face... ever. Or was this supposed to be something else?
shareMy First impression was "wow, another '9 songs' movie :D
Then I was like, niiiiiceeee another 'porn story genre' :D
if you thought this movie was nothing more then a porno, try turning your sound on and stop quick searching the scenes. if you paid attention to the story you would know that this is just a new take on filming. the director wanted to drop the liness that seperate film from pornography and not have the restrictions as such. if you only saw this as a porno flick then you're too young to even be watching it. im not saying this was a 10/10 or even close, but it was nice to see them take away any restrictions that get placed on movies.
shareWell, perhaps you're right only about one thing; "a new take on filming" 😃
Its not even the sex scenes, there is nothing new about it at all
Well, we could argue over this for quite some time while being pointless, you liked the film; I did not.
No point of getting even close here, Thank you 😃
You sir, are right!
shareDude you have *beep* taste in vagoo, that thing was beautiful
shareAll i got to say is that girl can suck a mean dick so much so that i could give a hoot about her acting abilities . she should stick to sucking dick in low budget pornos like this one .Shes the superhead of the pretentious art house porno flicks never have a i seen a dick sucked with such believable enthusiasm she's a whore's whore i like it .
http://ancensored.com/clip/Diet-of-Sex/Raquel-Martnez/85641
character is habitual action, we are what we do habitually.
I don't think that the OP is interested in "vagoo" (retarded word btw). I think that they are in the closet and in denial. They love cock but hate themselves for their obvious secret desires.
share