MovieChat Forums > The Conjuring 2 (2016) Discussion > Um, what?

Um, what?

posted 8 years ago by cucumberzombi
8 replies | jump to latest

This movie was TERRIBLE! I had such high expectations with this film. Everyone that I know that have seen this movie, have raved about it. Did we see the same movie!? The CGI was cheesy. The concept wasn't great. The acting was horrendous.

My roommate, and I saw this together earlier today, and we laughed sooo hard. I'm sure others in the theater hated us, but it wasn't intentional. It was just THAT bad.

Are we the only ones that feel like, and I quote, "I feel like we are watching Roger Rabbit?"

It was bad...

[–] petville_king 8 years ago

ok go flex somewhere else

[–] JoeMama2016 8 years ago

Most movie goers and critics disagree with you.

[–] rstacy2010 8 years ago

I agree. This movie was completely awful. It was 2 hours too long.

[–] EvilMentor 8 years ago

It's not "completely awful" still?

[–] librarianjen 8 years ago

What CGI are you referring to?

Support your local library!

[–] business-strictly9969 8 years ago

Completely agree. I have no idea how it has such a high rating especially on something as cold blooded as imdb. Even some of the greatest movies don't have a rating so high. What gives? This movie was painful to sit all the way through. In fact 4 individual dates got up and left during my viewing. The intense parts were okay at best but the worst part was the set up that seemed like it took forever followed by breaks in between the jump scares that made me all but forget about the last one. The first and spin off were good. This one lost sight of what made the first two so scary.

[–] EvilMentor 8 years ago

Why is it no longer "terrible" or "bad"? In any case it is certainly better than that poorly made and horribly written Creep movie.

[–] Tyler-A-Arse 8 years ago

The movie was not very good.