Why no lost symbol
I know in the trivia it says that it has similarities with National Treasure but that came out years ago. IMO lost symbol is a better book than inferno.
shareI know in the trivia it says that it has similarities with National Treasure but that came out years ago. IMO lost symbol is a better book than inferno.
sharehttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt1422137/
shareThey wanted to shoot Lost Symbol, but then Inferno book came out, and a studio cancelled it.
share[deleted]
Yea i'd say it was more them wanting to make the more recent book so it was something fresher in people's minds. Plus i'd say Inferno had a little more different story line than the others. Lost Symbol was very similar to DaVinci Code, but this one felt a bit different. Overall they have similar tones and feel to the plot but having the plague and the outcome of the book especially set it apart to me.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Well, Da Vinci Code movie was made before Angels and Demons. Maybe they're sticking with the out of order deal and will make The Lost Symbol next. :3
shareIt's still listed as a potential future project for Tom. Maybe they're planning to make two more of these things.
"I said no camels, that's five camels, can't you count?"
[deleted]
This.
Since the first two books' movies were done in reverse order, they're probably just doing the same thing with the latter two books.
I remember reading that this was the main reason for postponing the production of the Lost Symbol. They decided to shoot Inferno instead whilst Dan Brown could adjust the screenplay so it doesn't come across as another National Treasure.
Expect both the be released in the future but for now Inferno is easier to produce.
Personally I'd like to see the release of the Lost Symbol alongside the Uncharted movie or National Treasure 3 so we get a double dose of action/adventure with similar themes. I always like that.
"...so it doesn't come across as another National Treasure."
This is the reason, exactly.
How could anyone compare Lost Symbol with National Treasure, Lost Symbol was so much better.
shareI read Lost Symbol cover to cover on a plane to Scotland, and finished it before I landed. It wasn't nearly as good as the first two, but it was better than Inferno, which I couldn't finish. I lost interest about 2/3rds of the way through it. I do plan to see the movie, because I like Tom Hanks, but it's not going to be as high a priority as Minions is! That's the movie I most want to see this summer!
shareI do confess myself, whilst trying to read Inferno in hardcover it began to lose me, unless were I sitting on a plane with nothing more to do, then it would fulfill all my much needed occupied time; however, life always finds ways to intervene. Instead, I listened to Inferno on audiobook while commuting about in my car, and continued on that way. When I find a book being back-shelved in my collection, I lean towards my secondary medium of favor.
There were some sections within Inferno that I realized I wished I had been savoring via hardcover, because rewinding during an audiobook is rather haphazard and sloppy. Drinking up Dan Brown's cooked up words are just deliciously cherishable to my palate. How he reminisces through Langdon's classroom settings supplements palpably to the story overall enhancing the present conflict. Only if the movies would portray the same effect; unfortunately films are always strangled with time restraints.
The Lost Symbol was a tantamount achievement, methinks, within the Robert Langdon series. Inferno was a jewel, but I wouldn't necessary compare a ruby to a diamond. I am a meticulously patient person, and believe deeply in the old saying of "save the best for last." Thus, let them produce Inferno firstly, and Lost Symbol secondly. Let the better of the two chime the loudest and shine the brightest. It would serve better to have such an elaborately and sensationally masterminded series of work climax with a crescendo, than to burn out and leave everyone in want. The context and the delivery are all crucial aspects of entertainment.
The fact of the matter is that National Treasure and The Lost Symbol are far too similar, and it would be far better served to allow enough time to pass by that audiences and critics have forgotten all about it before unleashing Dan Brown's own.
I do confess myself, whilst trying to read Inferno in hardcover it began to lose me, unless were I sitting on a plane with nothing more to do, then it would fulfill all my much needed occupied time; however, life always finds ways to intervene. Instead, I listened to Inferno on audiobook while commuting about in my car, and continued on that way. When I find a book being back-shelved in my collection, I lean towards my secondary medium of favor.
There were some sections within Inferno that I realized I wished I had been savoring via hardcover, because rewinding during an audiobook is rather haphazard and sloppy. Drinking up Dan Brown's cooked up words are just deliciously cherishable to my palate. How he reminisces through Langdon's classroom settings supplements palpably to the story overall enhancing the present conflict. Only if the movies would portray the same effect; unfortunately films are always strangled with time restraints.
The Lost Symbol was a tantamount achievement, methinks, within the Robert Langdon series. Inferno was a jewel, but I wouldn't necessary compare a ruby to a diamond. I am a meticulously patient person, and believe deeply in the old saying of "save the best for last." Thus, let them produce Inferno firstly, and Lost Symbol secondly. Let the better of the two chime the loudest and shine the brightest. It would serve better to have such an elaborately and sensationally masterminded series of work climax with a crescendo, than to burn out and leave everyone in want. The context and the delivery are all crucial aspects of entertainment.
The fact of the matter is that National Treasure and The Lost Symbol are far too similar, and it would be far better served to allow enough time to pass by that audiences and critics have forgotten all about it before unleashing Dan Brown's own.
ROTFL :D
shareFunny, Inferno was the first Dan Brown book I read, and it intrigued me so much. Since you said you are only about 2/3 of the way into the book, perhaps you haven't yet read about one character's plot twist, and how the threat ultimately plays out, I would recommend finishing it.
shareWell if you read the ending of Lost Symbol you can see why it was skipped. It places an object that liberal Hollywood hates and shows it being revered.
Very disappointing as Lost Symbol was far better than Inferno.
Disagree completely. Lost Symbol is the worst Langdon book by far. The villain was supremely lame and i guessed the twist in the first quarter of the book. I have a feeling this is why it was skipped
share[deleted]
I too thought Lost Symbol was just terrible.. really awful.. lame, generic and predictable.. I too guessed the twist well before it happened and believe me, I am not very good at guessing twists lol. Really bad book. Inferno was decently better, but still doesn't touch the first two.
shareApparently it's that 'The Lost Symbol' was too close in story and theme to 'National Treasure'. I've not read the book so have no idea how accurate that is.
"I don't reckon I got no reason to kill nobody."
[deleted]
Cheers. I'll take your word for that. Like I said, I've not read it.
"I don't reckon I got no reason to kill nobody."
[deleted]
Because it was a HORRIBLE book. Anyone with a brain had it figured out in the first 100 pages.
"I knew it. I'm surrounded by *beep*
[deleted]