I really liked that scene with the story about the coins (I think BCS has some terrific writing that makes these relationships far more nuanced than most other shows). Here, a childhood story illustrates the moral direction both Jimmy and Chuck would head towards.
Jimmy wants immediate results and wouldn't mind using a scam or two to get it. Chuck would've sided with the father and would see his "soft touch" as unbending honor and genuine goodness. But an earlier story that Chuck shared shows that the father seemed aloof to Chuck, and both parents favored little Jimmy more, and that's where the resentment started to brew. To side with the father respect the values of honest hard work, decency, truthfulness and loyalty - only to still be passed over....has to wound Chuck deeply. In a world of structured law and certainties, his lack of affection from his parents (at least, compared to what Jimmy was given) is one thing that does not make any sense to Chuck's ordered life. The scammer, liar and troublemaker gets more parental love than him. For what? Being the baby brother? Making people laugh more?
But to get back to the main thread - we're getting some interesting past history with these characters and a better understanding on how Jimmy acquired his worldview.
reply
share