OMG TURD Warning!
Look, I know the people that helped make this are attached to it.
I know it is hard to admit when something you love is bad...
This is bad... I meant it's not like 1 bad, but it isn't above a 3.5 EVER!
I disagree. It was better than most horror I've seen. When I first started watching it had a B movie feel to it and that somewhat changed as the movie progressed. I think they did great with the budget they had to work work...I'm impressed with everyone involved. If this is a 3.5 to you please give me some examples for better movies with the same budget...don't worry I'll wait. Don't forget the people that work in these films. They work just like the rest of us but they actually have cool jobs. Don't put them down for doing what they like and actually getting paid for it. And, on top of that, doing a pretty decent job. It's ok to be postive my friend instead of trying to tear things down.
shareCouple a films leap instantly to mind. Primer (2004) budget $ 7k, box office gross $ 545,436.00. Also made for only seven thousand dollars - El Mariaci (1992) earned $ 2 million at the box office. Lance Henriksen's pay check was likely more than the combined budgets of these two far superior films. I'm sure others on this board could come up with a long list of great films shot on a shoe string budget.
shareThe first Blair Witch was made for 50k and grossed 250ish million.
shareWhat does a budget have to do with the plot?
If you don't have money for practical or CGI effects don't use them.
I have no clue what the budget of this train wreck was, let me know and I will find no less than 10 movies that are better.
--- Update:
Still waiting on that response so I can compare budgets.