MovieChat Forums > Death Comes to Pemberley (2014) Discussion > Sure looks like Pemberley to me.

Sure looks like Pemberley to me.


Firstly, I hate fanfic. My teeth start grinding after a few paragraphs, even when it's written by PD James.

Secondly, if you're going to do anything with P&P you have to judge your two main casting decisions with a perfection required almost nowhere else. We all know Elizabeth and Darcy so well. So the producers of the two productions which have dared to go off piste, Lost in Austen and this one, must have thought long and hard. Gemma Arterton did extremely well in Lost in Austen, a blend of period drama, summer RomCom and Dr Who, and Anna Maxwell Martin is simply perfect here, in Austen meets the Poirot Christmas Special.

Anna gives us the mature Elizabeth, holding court at her more informal Pemberley, with an older Darcy who has recovered all his confidence and is even more deeply smitten. They have a son and are clearly wonderful parents. Both characters have changed in exactly the way Austen predicted in her last chapter. Elizabeth has risen in status and now wears the authority of Pemberley, rationally softened, like its master. They are unusually sparkly together and very reminiscent of the Netherfield scenes. This is principally down down to the extremely good performances from two actors and an their understanding of their characters which goes way beyond the script.

The whole cast is outstanding, the best in a period drama since Emma09 and the mystery is satisfyingly interesting. There's lots of clever 'dialogue' with the original and arch references to earlier productions (it's the 95 Pemberley).

What's not to like?

Can't wait for the next instalment, as Pemberley itself is challenged and their relationship is tested and I'm dying to find out what the regulars, supergran, julie, random and Co. all think. I do hope the Bingleys, Caroline at least, turn up soon.

Of course, it isn't Austen. If it hurts you to think that it is, then imagine it as a 100-year prequel to Downton Abbey, 10 times better acted and 50 times better written.

reply

Alfa, have you read this book?

I won't get to watch this until tonight, but I will definitely chime in with my opinions. You know me well enough to know that!

http://currentscene.wordpress.com

reply

No, Julie. I picked it up in a bookshop and read a page or five. And put it down again.

I'll be surprised if you don't like it but I suspect that ignorance may turn out to be bliss as far as the book goes.

reply

I swore I'd watch it, even for the snark factor. *grin*

I know I don't post at my blog these days (Real Life is taking over), but my post about the book got 2,014 views yesterday (1,851 from the UK alone!) and so far today it has 338 views (282 from the UK). It is, in fact, the most read post I ever made.

And all because of a really boring book.

http://currentscene.wordpress.com

reply

I have to confess I've never read the book, but I'm tempted to now to see if it's as bad as this mini-series!

BriarRose

Growing old disgracefully

reply

Hi alfa. Thank you for starting this off.

I have to say that I agree with you. I have never read James' novel either, and I came into this with somewhat indifferent expectations. I was pleasantly surprised. Although the first installment didn't wow me, eps 2-3 surely did. I really felt as though they were Elizabeth and Darcy, and I was at Pemberley. Georgiana was also particularly well cast and played. Lydia was perfect. I'm less impressed with Jane; I didn't feel it with her portrayal, but that might be partially attributed to her very limited screen time.

(I, too, missed seeing Caroline Bingley, and too bad Lady Catherine's visit was so brief!)


Of course, it isn't Austen. If it hurts you to think that it is, then imagine it as a 100-year prequel to Downton Abbey, 10 times better acted and 50 times better written.


Brilliant!

reply