Was that princess's bum?
Or was that a butt double. Very nice indeed. Looking her up now.
shareLooks like it, considering they showed her face first and moved down to prove it!
share
MovieChat Forums > Kingsman: The Secret Service (2015) Discussion > Was that princess's bum?
It was stunt double's ass. Jackie Chan's, maybe
Born2Burn
If you have the brightness and contrast settings at the right level you can see her pussy.
shareI saw it in HD, I could see clear enough she was completely nude.
http://www.astortheatre.net.au/
Support great cinemas.
exactly, I still want to find out how they got away with showing her pussy in that scene. usually they show bush but hardly ever pussy when it comes to showing that area of a woman's body in a movie.
shareBecause it's not blatant or fully visible; I'm not sure what the right word would be. It's partially obscured by her rear end. Similar to Basic Instinct; there's enough visible to tell, but it doesn't turn into a gynecological exam. Also remember this is an R rated movie, so they probably could have gotten away with more.
Ladies and gentlemen...Mr.Conway Twitty
you mean she's not spreading her pussy by really bending over?
it doesn't matter though, I mean, pussy is pussy. and we clearly see her pussy, as far as seeing all of it from the outside. not that clearly in how clearly we see all of it. I don't know how you could think it's not blatant or fully visible, we see all of it, it's not obscured by her ass, how could it be? asses are not in front of pussies.
and it's blatant because it's not just in the background or partially visible, it's totally visible, you see all of it and it's a close up shot of her pussy. how more blatant can you get?
how could it not be her ass? you see her ass and her face in the shot.
shareCGI, Mr. Barnett. CGI.
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar and doesn't.
You're an idiot moviemancin, you're an idiot.
shareWhy's he an idiot? They could CGI that.
Get on the scale son! Get off the scale.
Why? It would still get the same rating and cost more.
shareno they couldn't.
share[deleted]
Yes we could.
That's why I never kiss 'em on the mouth
no, they couldn't.
share1) They absolutely could CGI that. To think they couldn't is just plain dumb. And...
2) I have no doubt its the same actress and its her REAL bum, not CGI (but they *could* if they wanted to) because its a bit part with an unknown actress. I'm sure they could have easily found an actress willing to film 2 scenes and show her bum. Which I'm sure is the case.
exactly, it's that actress's ass and pussy.
no, they couldn't cgi that. that would be retarded. why cgi something that you can easily get a body double or get an actress who can show all the nudity for? that would be a huge waste of money. cgi is only meant and was only created for special effects because they can't show something in a real way.
nudity they can show in a real way so that would be stupid and would defeat the purpose of using cgi. also it would make the nudity look unreal and that would ruin the scene. it would be like using a pitchfork to shovel snow. it wouldn't work. and that ass and that pussy look completely real because they are real.
They DIDN'T, but they most certainly COULD.
shareno they couldn't as that would be too expensive to ever do and it would be embarrassing to them to do it because it would look unrealistic and then people would not like their movie that much. so they couldn't do that. in special effects cgi works sometimes because it's a magical thing that we have never seen before.
shareGoddamn. I can't tell if you're dumb or stubborn. Probably a little of both.
shareIt's more than just her bum, dude.
Never trust a black man named "Chip."
She is swedish.
share