I have a question


So if one of the many themes of this movie is,

I swear by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.



Umm...so my question is, at the end of the movie, they risk their lives to save John Galt, isn't that completely against what they were preaching, they worked together, for no profit to save another without consideration for themselves?

reply

Dagny was willing to risk her life because she loved the d&#k. I guess the other guys did, too.

Anyway, don't try to overthink Ayn Rand stories.

reply

I watched all three movies only to be completely disappointed this had zero to do with the other 2 movies. What where they thinking?

reply

Rescuing John Galt was in the rational self interest of those who performed the rescue.



My New Year's resolution is to simply write 2̶0̶1̶4̶ 2015 instead of 2014"
.

reply

To be fair, it wasn't much of a risk. The "maximum security" facility was guarded by one guy who was too incompetent to operate his pistol.

reply

One of the many important things John Galt's full speech (in the novel) makes crystal clear is that risking or giving up something you value, in exchange for something you value more, is not a sacrifice. It's a trade you enter into for your own self-interest.

A mother who gives up the chance to buy a hat so she will have money to buy food for her baby is not sacrificing, if she values the baby more than the hat. A man who risks his life to save another man, someone he loves, admires, and considers to be worth at least as much as himself, is not sacrificing either.

But someone who has to be manipulated into this sort of heroic action, NOT because he believes he will be doing something of value by his own standards, but in order to assuage his own guilt or please others or appear brave, is operating against the quoted principle.

reply