Jodi Arias + Casey Anthony - Jodi Arias: Dirty Little Secret (2013) Discussion

[–] ghettosgirl 11 years ago

Baby killer had a very stupid jury. Thats it. They thought she was guilty. The judge himself said there was more than enough evidence to convict her. Not even guilty of aggravated child abuse or neglect or whatever it is? Come on now. The child died under her watch, thats the LEAST they could have given her. All came down to a dumb ass jury. That and liar baby killer always denied doing anything to the baby. Jodi admitted she did it (eventually) although she claimed self-defense, she still admitted.

reply

[–] vodka_and_caviar 11 years ago

Casey is probably the greatest liar I've ever seen. Jodi is no match for her.

reply

[–] Mithrandir-Olorin2 11 years ago

People who think Casey should have been convicted are idiots.

"When the chips are down... these Civilized people... will Eat each Other"

reply

[–] ghettosgirl 11 years ago

I guess you are either her defense team or one of the morons who let her go or a moron fan of hers. She killed that child and anyone who thinks differently are dumber than that jury. Even most of the jury felt that she did it, her own father believes she did it, her actions speak otherwise and the judge knows she did it. you must be blind and deaf. And btw, those "idiots" you speak of are about 99% of the world. the ones who aren't stupid and can put two and two together... but, go ahead thinking OBVIOUS killers shouldnt be convicted. for, whatever reason you have. Are you seriously going to post something so stupid with NO reason to back you up? Okay, casey anthony jury... Btw I'm sure she and other child killers like you just love the fact that you are so *beep* stupid for believing complete utter *beep* congratulations for being a total idiot. I'm sure Caylee (the dead child) appreciates you not thinking her mother killed her and letting her murderer go free. Glad you can sleep at night thinking like that. You are just as sick as she is.

reply

[–] Mithrandir-Olorin2 11 years ago

The evidence was entirely circumstantial whether she did or not. I think it was probably an accidental death that she responded to idiotically. Most of people's reasons for thinking she did it is "Why would she react that way" well people need to learn that not everyone's brain works the same way, and you end someone's freedom only on not understanding them.

Napalitano is more articulate then I am.
[ur]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=ZLMLQJ9gb_o#t=442s[/url]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qc5UIv05sgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLMLQJ9gb_o

"When the chips are down... these Civilized people... will Eat each Other"

reply

[–] ELCaminoReal 11 years ago

Casey was found not guilty. There was no evidence. Deal with it. I agreed with the verdict.

reply

[–] ELCaminoReal 11 years ago

Nobody know how did the baby die. Nobody saw Casey kill the baby. Nobody saw her throw the baby in the trunk.

reply

[–] ghettosgirl 11 years ago

you guys are so naive. but, okay, continue to think that way. she loves it. im sure shes laughing as she sees people buying her bs and getting away with it. shes used to it.

reply

[–] Mithrandir-Olorin2 11 years ago

People like you are exactly who I hope never get on Juries.

"When the chips are down... these Civilized people... will Eat each Other"

reply

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] aprilkepner 11 years ago

I don't think she's innocent, but there definitely wasn't enough evidence or motive for a conviction. She obviously had something to do with her baby's death. I fully believe that it wasn't intentional and that Caylee died due to some neglect or mistake Casey made and she panicked. Who knows how you'd react in a situation like that? That being said, her walking free was a complete miscarriage of justice. It's not okay to accidentally kill your daughter and bury her. They could have at least given her manslaughter, for crap's skae.

reply

[–] ELCaminoReal 11 years ago

None of her friends said she was a BAD mother. Yes, she's guilty of stealing money/checks from her own parents & friends but they still had no strong evidence to connect her directly with murder tho.

reply

[–] vodka_and_caviar 11 years ago

Her friends weren't even around Caylee enough to be able to say that honestly.

reply

[–] ELCaminoReal 11 years ago

Her ex-boyfriends testified on CA trial and they didn't even say anything bad about her, they were with her and her daughter. The "Prosecuting Casey Anthony" movie made Jeff Ashton look like an IDIOT.

reply

[–] vodka_and_caviar 11 years ago

I'm not even talking about the movie. I've never seen it. However, I've read Jeff's book.

reply

[–] activista 9 years ago

@Mithrandir-Olorin2

What? If Anthony was so innocent, than why did she claim that a nanny had stolen her child, and then it turned out that this women she accused of taking her child had never even met her. And that wasn't the first time she lied about some aspects of the case,which is what landed her in jail to begin with. Just because no evidence was found dosen't mean that's she innocent---it sounds like someone made a deliberate effort to get rid of the incriminating evidence,from what I read about the case,that's all. I still thinks she's guilty, and that she's nothing but a sociopath, but, that just my honest opinion,though.

reply

[–] kascha-klaussen 10 years ago

I've got to say it's better that you haven't got the slightest idea how the legal system works because if you did I'd have to find some other source for "pee my leg funny".

And your mob rules crap. Just can't call it. Since 99% of the world sits at a TV and thinks jurisprudence is optional when they decide it is, I guess it is. Of course, if any of those 99% get so much as a jaywalking ticket they don't agree with and get shuffled through the system they want to whine and scream like two month old babies about what's fair and not fair.

I get sort of sick of weak minded people who seem to think someone has to be complicit in something in order to understand what's going on. Fact is? The prosecution didn't prove their case. Their star witness was being debunked in the newspaper as she spoke when she was claiming it was impossible that someone could drown in a pool and not be discovered. LOL - during the case the paper talked about a woman who had been dead in a public pool for two days while the pool was open and nobody discovered her. What a horrendously bad break for the people's case!

Their computer evidence was garbage, they missed the stuff that would have convicted, and that's not the jury's fault. It is the DA's job to prove the case and nobody cares what the jury "thinks" should happen. It's what they can say was proven should happen. Instead of writing ridiculous posts to people coming off like some sort of shrill, brainless Salem witch hunter perhaps you ought to get schooled on how cases get proven in this country and how they don't, and also get schooled about how bad this country would be if juries stopped giving a damn whether cases against people were proven or not and just did what the hell they wanted to do.

Dumdum.

reply

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 10 years ago

[deleted]

[–] purpledragonfly0505 11 years ago

Casey didn't leave evidence behind...Jodi? Uh...did.

Leaving the effing camera in the idiot boyfriend's dryer? Casey is shaking her head at that stupid move.

It's a guaranteed disaster...like eating a burrito before sex.

reply

[–] ELCaminoReal 11 years ago

Jeff Ashton and his team wanted to prove that she did it but they failed.

reply

[–] MydnightRose 11 years ago

I think Casey is guilty but it's up to the DA to prove it. You can't convict somebody because you are pretty sure they are guilty if the prosecutor doesn't provide proof.

Clark Kent + Lois Lane 4ever
DC Can Suck It

reply

[–] Balberith 10 years ago

The prosecution made a mistake by going for the death penalty.

"A real man would rather bow down to a strong woman than dominate a weak one"

reply

[–] VioletBarbie 10 years ago

Casey Anthony is a lot smarter than stabby could ever hope to be. Wherever Casey is, I doubt she's given Arias a second thought.

reply