MovieChat Forums > Beauty and the Beast (2017) Discussion > The end credits were the best part of th...

The end credits were the best part of the movie

posted 8 years ago by Gastonian (946)
3 replies | jump to latest

Not just because it meant this piece of trash was over, but because the animation in the credits were beautifully done. And that begs the question, if they could do that part so well, then why does the rest of the film look so cheap?

Some other questions...

Why does Dan Stevens look so dopey when he smiles?
Why was Ewan McGregor doing a French accent when no one else was in a film set in France?
When will Emma Watson go away and start SJW'ing full time?
Did Ian McKellen lose a bet or does he just do any piece of crap Bill Condon directs because of Gods and Monsters?
What is the appeal of Josh Gad?
Once again, why does the film look so cheap? The effects suck my balls. Did they spend all of their budget on blow for the craft service table?
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

[–] EDavies (41) 8 years ago

You got to be trolling. And a hater. You're picking relatively stupid reasons to hate something.

[–] Gastonian (946) 8 years ago

No, not a hater or a troll. I loved the animated film and the French version at least attempted to reinvent the story instead of copying the animated version beat for beat. I'll admit there's a healthy dose of sarcasm in my post but also valid criticisms. I wanted to like the film. Glad you did. And I see your best reply is to call my me names rather than debate the issues I had with it. I didn't resort to that.

[–] EDavies (41) 8 years ago

After seeing your recent post in your other thread, I apologize for insulting you. To each their own.