I know there is a message about animal cruelty on this board. Important issue - but I have another issue concerning animal symbolism in the movie. It seems obvious that Aydin lets the wild horse loose, because he no longer wants to manipulate or control others, but what is the point of shooting the rabbit and bringing it home to his wife like a kind of trophy? Any ideas?
I just watched the movie, but the idea I had is that Aydin catching the rabbit is a symbol of him finally catching up with some issues in his life, thus becoming the 'new man' that he talks about in the final voiceover. Aydin's actions towards the end of the move (before the hunt) also called out -- whether consciously or not -- two bluffs of sorts: the fake friendliness of the teacher, revealed by his snide remarks at the friend's place (in vino veritas...), and the lamentations of the tenant, who now has effectively chosen his own fate by refusing Nihal's charity. Catching the rabbit resonated well, to me, with calling out these bluffs. Just my two cents, I'd love to hear other people's ideas as well.
the idea I had is that Aydin catching the rabbit is a symbol of him finally catching up with some issues in his life, thus becoming the 'new man' that he talks about in the final voiceover.
I don't understand how killing a defenceless animal helps Aydin become a 'new man.' Seems it just makes him a symbol of the macho male who exerts power over the weak, something he's been accused of throughout the film. Ironic, since he released the captive horse in a seeming gesture of good will. Then again, he was the one who initially wanted to profit from capturing the wild horse in the first place.
My take is that he released the horse because the horse symbolized male freedom. It was a wild horse after all. Horses are usually identified with 'male' attributes such as power, whereas rabbits are identified with docility or weakness, usually 'female' attributes. His shooting the rabbit seemed to be a sign that he conquered the feminine; his showing it to his wife at the window was seemingly a macho pose, another sign of dominance over that perceived as weaker.
Aydin may write a conciliatory letter to his wife, but it's almost as if he's doing what his sister talked about--'turning the other cheek' to make his spouse feel guilty. His last action in the film is to begin writing his manuscript. He is focused more on himself and what he wants to accomplish rather than on his wife.
You have interesting points here, but I must say my reading was a bit opposite...
The release of the horse, as it appears exactly after the big dialog with his wife or she confesses to feeling trapped by him, seems to me a clear parallelism to the situation of the wife: he releases the strong, vibrant, young horse because he has just gained conscience of how he "trapped", for his purposes, a strong young wife, and robbed her of that youth.
I'm not saying my reading is more correct than yours, it's just a different attempt at interpretation...
And I can't say anything intelligent about the rabbit!
My feeling is that Aydin would have preferred to shoot his romantic rival Levent instead of the rabbit. Perhaps the rabbit then symbolized Levent in Aydin's mind, which could explain the triumphant way he showed it to his wife.