But this movie is underrated and every bit as good as Part one. It had more action and more scary bits.
I for one do not understand why it's rated only 5.3. I give it 7
Yeah it was good. Horrors aren't hardly ever given good ratings. This one isn't the exception
shareThis movie is well written and doesn't just retread the theme of the first.
shareThe acting was terrible.
The cheap boo-scares where funny.
One of the best horror sequels ever and is as good as the first, if not better.
share100% agreed.
Saw it through first time a few months ago and was like.......what's wrong with it? It was like Nightmare on Elm St 2, done right, if you can make sense of that. Also, I think Elm 2 is great, no dis.