MovieChat Forums > Narcos (2015) Discussion > They dont portray Colombia as that poor....

They dont portray Colombia as that poor.


In the neighborhoods it looks really impoverished but everything surrounding the government looks good. Also they make it sound like everyone has Tvs and such. Heck my family didnt have a TV until 1987 I cant imagine the average Colombian having access to Tv or Radio or being able to pick up a news paper everyday...

reply

I actually thinkn they do. they seem to do a good job of showing those with drug monehy and those without.
but it is a good point. I've been there 5 times and my cousin is in military there, and the avg Colombian family doesn't have much. that probably could have been shown even more...but I think it was represented.

reply

Its like they live in poverty housing yet have access to media in mass forms. Like the whole nation seems to outcry when ever something big happens. Or they are able to get places when they shouldnt be able to while having so little.

reply

ike the whole nation seems to outcry when ever something big happens


Radio and cheap ass second hand tv.

Or they are able to get places when they shouldnt be able to while having so little.


Example? But, by the way, public transport is big in south america.

...but they hung him anyway.
Hanged, Ami. Your father was not a tapestry.

reply

public transport is big in south america.


Yep, and super affordable.

And everyone has a TV. Look at a picture taken from above a favela or any slum, tons of the houses have a) a water tank and b) a satellite dish on their roof.


Do you even know what honor is?
- A horse.

reply

WTF? Most everyone had TV's in the late 80's and 90's! It wasn't anything special.

The third world isn't like what you think it is.

reply

In a lot of impoverished countries, especially around the cities, people may only have a shack to live in, but they will have a T.V and a Direct T.V type dish. Example, India, Belize, Mexico and many countries in Africa. T.V's can be very cheap, and satellite service is also really cheap, even though in the U.S we pay an arm and a leg for it.

I always say the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
--- Gin Rummy

reply

The third world isn't like what you think it is.


Columbia is not, and never was, a third world country

...but they hung him anyway.
Hanged, Ami. Your father was not a tapestry.

reply

Columbia is not, and never was, a third world country


I looked it up and Colombia is considered a third world country due to the poverty rate.







{._.}
My eyes are watching you

reply

Colombia has recently surpassed Argentina to become South America's second largest economy.

It is currently a booming economy and one of the CIVET nations (Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey and South Africa), an acronym given to countries which are predicted by some to be among the next emerging markets to quickly rise in economic prominence over the coming decades.

reply

Well, I live there (though I'm from Spain) and it really depends on what parts you look at. While there are nice towns and neighborhoods, many parts of the country can definitely be considered third world. Its actual name is "Colombia", by the way.

reply

The third world isn't like what you think it is.



Columbia is not, and never was, a third world country



Well, technically you're wrong as third world referred originally to anything outside Western European countries and US allies (first world) and Soviet Union's communist block (second world), except China was maybe an anomaly. Also Colombia is a developing country with many people living in slums or even worse in substandard conditions in poverty in the countryside. Yes, I've seen it with my own eyes while visiting there but I have to say that there is also a relatively affluent middle class especially in big cities so it's not a dirt poor *beep* like some places for example in Africa.

reply