The writing and acting felt like a cartoon. Whereas in cartoons faces are over-animated to express emotions, with actual people it just felt weird. I started to imagine I was watching a cartoon, almost like a Studio Ghibli film, and then Emilia Clarkes horribly forced performance of the cliched and self-conscious writing became more bearable.
I could not agree more! I loved the book but stopped watching this after about 30 minutes! This performance was GOD AWFUL!! This movie could have been much better if they'd restrained her a bit!
I know it might not be popular opinion, but I personally like her eyebrows - they add to her expressive face. I agree that certain scenes maybe didn't come off exactly as Emilia intended them to, but I thought her ever-moving eyebrows especially suited the character of Lou, and I didn't think they took away from the movie much at all.
Lou is supposed to be a girl content with the simple pleasures: bubbly, quirky, and full of life. Emilia's performance definitely charmed me, but I'm already a fan of hers. I find her positively radiant, and her genuine personality just adds to that. :)
I agree. She has a great ability to be expressive, but I don't doubt the director pushed her into overacting territory. She's proven she can be much better of an actor in other places.
I couldn't even look at her face in some scenes. I know her character is supposed to be exceptionally genuine and kind, and I suppose those exaggerated facial expressions were the only way she could think of to portray it, but really now.
I also wondered why nobody stopped her or told her to tone it down a bit.