While I wouldn't consider the movie series even "good" overall, it certainly had some fun moments. Having just seen the Final Chapter though, I felt it was the poorest, and mainly due to the sidelining of Wesker in favor of retconning in Isaacs as the main bad guy.
Now, I am a HUGE Iain Glen fan, and he was great hammy fun in this, but suddenly making the forgettable bad guy of one of the weakest films the main villain for the final act seemed quite jarring to me, especially as Wesker had been nicely set up over the previous three films for a showdown with Alice.
The fact they gave Isaacs "superpowers" (straight from the RDJ Sherlock Holmes movies, of all things!) to fight Alice when Wesker could - SHOULD - have done so just seemed even more jarring. Could Wesker's actor not be in the film more than he was for some reason?!
I think they should have had Wesker fight Alice in the classic laser room, have her trick HIM with the grenade, then either finish him with the laser grid or leave him to die either then and there or when Alyssa self-destructs the facility. Then have Alice chase Isaacs to the surface, where he is confronted and stabbed by his zealot clone.
This would give both characters fitting ends, not change the script apart from one fight scene, remove the ridiculous "I'm a cyborg" WTF powers of Isaacs (who should not survive a grenade exploding in his pocket regardless!) and keep the same ending.
But then, as I said, plot, script and - well - planning wasn't really this series' strong suite! I mean, pretty much each film retconned or rebooted the previous one!
reply
share