I'm all up for a good debate on free-will and how its dealt with in Arrival.
I personally don't believe in free-will, in the sense that we have any true choice, although the concepts of choice, decision, will etc are still allowable of course for definitions of things that we "do".
But science/neuroscience constantly supports predeterminism. There simply isn't room for some non-physical element (e.g. a soul) to ponder and truly make decisions. There's always causality, tracing right back to the big-bang.
Now, having said that, I can understand why evolution has gradually selected for what contributes to the human experience.
We need a sense of free-will to feel in control of ourselves and our lives, and a sense of volition (remember, our actions are actually very automatic) to separate our own causality from the causality of others. We need to say "I did this, you did that" to attribute happenings to people.
It doesn't matter that conscious-will or volition are illusions, because they still have benefits to our well-being and organisation of society.
A question that arises from this is - does it matter if we became aware of our inherent automaticity and determinism?
The question that the film asks is - what if we were aware of the future in the same way as we're aware of the past? We're still determined and automatic, but we now have forwards and backwards awareness?
To be honest, I get lost with that idea. Memory is a consequence of events, which allows us to learn from and act on events. If memory goes backwards, meaning that we can learn from and act on future events, then that would change the future, and our knowing of events would keep creating new memories that then changes our behaviour. It would become impossible, in the same way that we can't remember an event from the past then act now to change that event in the past. I can't wrap my head around the idea of times arrow not being in just one direction, because I haven't met the heptapods yet.
reply
share