Hehe…I don’t disagree with this at all. I simply think that the sequel plan was dumb. There really wasn’t a plan to bring it all together.
I just think that it would have been more interesting to bring Plagueis back into the story as an antagonist, which would have also brought all 3 trilogies together into a bind.
Palapatine was already destroyed, so my idea would have been to throw an even bigger entity that was always playing it bigger from behind the curtains - Palapatine’s mentor.
The way I think, it would have felt more authentic, if there was a bigger player than Palpatine being the protagonist in the sequel trilogy - the trilogy that ultimately ends the saga. The Sith that can cheat death. It’s too easy to say that he lied to Palpatine (and was manipulating him). IMO, this antagonist would have flowed much better than cheaply bringing Palpatine back ….who then died, and can conveniently come back whenever Disney wants him to 🙄.
It’s so easy to see that Disney didn’t really have a plan with the sequel trilogy. The actor that plays Palpatine wasn’t asked to reprise the role until the last minute.
Storytelling-wise, it would have made more sense to keep Snoke as the villain (and reveal his true persona in the 3rd movie)….but Rian Johnson absolutely needed to make his stain 🙄.
Making Plagues the villain still keeps Anakin’s kill of Palpatine legit (as the chosen one), especially if his offspring is also responsible for killing Palapatine’s master - Without Anakin, you don’t have Luke or Leia.
If you wanted to play against expectations, you could have Leia kill Plagueis.
reply
share