Rian Johnson had Kathleen Kennedy looking over his shoulder the whole time..... we see that in the behind the scenes footage....... all the crap and women placement was her work....... he did not have free hands.
.
"she had surrounded herself with highly controllable men. Not experienced strong men because they would cause trouble and not women because they would cause trouble too. "
Sounds about right. I think Johnson got his trilogy exactly for the reasons outlined in this piece. The repeated director and writer firings were becoming an embarrassment. One director, whose name escapes me, was asked by a reporter if would like to do a Star Wars movie. βNo, I like to finish my films.β
Kennedy is the personification of the Peter Principle. She ascended just beyond the level of her competence. I think Solo will profit but will also underperform relative to their expectations. I think Episode IX will see an extensive boycott and will flirt with Justice League territory, struggling to reach the black. Only that kind of failure will displace the Queen Bee.
It will continue... Not only that but this kind of ideology will spread to other big studio movies...
Haven't you asked why this started, at this scale, with Star Wars? It is because it needed a rabidly loyal fanbase, which is also infantalised. Innocents. StarWars is about not letting go of childhood. Thus viewers bring their childhood attachments with them as they buy the tickets and merchandise regardless of what is on screen as long as it is StarWars branded.
These aren't the kind of people who will reject a movie and take their money elsewhere... Rather, StarFans will watch the movie several times in theatre just to make sure it is actually not any good and will still buy the steelbook special deluxe edition discs with toy for their collection, for completeness sake... π
90% of the complainers will still watch Solo and have already started to convince themselves to watch the fiollowing one. It will do decent enough numbers. People here are arguing at the margins. The Force Awakens was 3 years ago and by the time the next Star Wars movie is released, completing the Rey trilogy, it will be the only Star Wars that a generation of children knows. Rey is thier Luke/Hans... It's already done. Kathleen is the new Lucas.
And other executives, producers and filmmakers will copy Kathleen's success...
But don' dispair! There is another world out there.. As a non-StarWars fan I always saw StarWars as a cultish obsession, as a way to be part of a tribe that I didn't want to be part of.. This is liberating, as there is a whole world of actual cinema out there that trounces StarWars in all aspects, yet it doesn't demand loyalty, consumersim or adopting an idiology of "force" nonsense, eternal childhood or feminism. π Liberate yourselves from StarWars and you'll be able to see Kathleens StarWars as just another consumer cult, with weird ideology. Take your money and mind elsewhere... Grow out of it. It's easy...
Your "you guys need to grow up" schtick got old a long time ago. If Star Wars is a cultish obsession, I wonder what brand of obsession leads someone who isn't a fan to repeatedly post cheap shots on Star Wars discussion boards?
Are you arguing that StarWars 'fandom' isn't cultishlessly obsessive or that you don't like to be reminded of it on the 'the-state-of-StarWars' threads that are posted on an almost daily basis here?
More to the point of this thread, it does matter. If fans watch these movies and continue to spend billions on them uncritically, in a religious manner due to childhood attachment then they will continue to be made in this way.
But the hypothetical widespread boycott of the next episode that you write about above will not happen percisely because of the cult of StarWars... The question to most StarWars fans is not whether to watch the movie or not, it is how many times to watch it in theatre and how many discs, digital downloads and toys to buy.
Are they really going to leave that space empty on the StarWars shelf-shrine, where episodes 8 & 9 are supposed to be?
I don't begrudge people their hobbies, but for the fans to continue to spend billions on something that dissapoints them is a sign of either maschochism or of cultish observance... It is possible to let go of this, to retain fond youthful memories of StarWars and to move on...
It's the cult appeal that allows for this pain to continue as is evidenced by the blog post in the OP and by the hundreds of similar threads of pain that will be posted from now until episode 9...
Be it the inverted hermeneutic or some alchemy theory the next sequel in the franchise will play upon some archetypal framework and lure just enough in for there to be a new hope for the next trilogy.
Audiences might be saturated with Disney by that point though and seek their pleasures elsewhere Reno.
Fans watched the SW movies repeatedly. Disney is destroying the enthusiasm that fans have for the SW movies. Last Jedi made 50% the box office that Force Awakens made because fans didn't have as many repeat viewings. Merchandise didn't sell. I may see future Disney SW, but maybe once in a cheap local theater or borrow the DVD from a library out of curiosity. No more merchandise for me including DVDs and books. Less involvement by fans still translates to less money for Disney. If the quality becomes really bad, then I won't see it at all like some fans are doing now.
Fans are upset because the quality of Disney SW is so bad. Those complaints along with less revenue may make Disney create better quality SW films in the future.