Since vampires cannot be photographed, why did nobody think of taking a picture of Dennis? If he were merely human, he would be visible in a photo. Instead of waiting up to five years for him to grow fangs or not, a simple photo would have confirmed that he is indeed a vampire. Besides, what kind of parents are Mavis and Johnny if they're not taking tons of pictures of their son? That's what parents do! :p
shareIt was stated (multiple times) that if Dennis didn't get his vampire fangs by his 5th birthday, then he would human. If the large bat thing hadn't thrown Winnie and Dennis didn't get upset, he never would have grown fangs and become a vampire. Up until his 5th birthday he WAS human.
shareI don't know about that. It was also stated (multiple times) that they didn't know if he was a human or not. Nobody said he might become a vampire. He was not a human up until he got fangs. That was never stated. Nobody said "what if he doesn't turn into a vampire." They said "what if he isn't a vampire." All dialogue suggested to me that he either was or wasn't a vampire from birth and that it was only a matter of time before they learned what he already was.
shareno you are wrong. they specifically stated that"if it doesn't happen by the time of his 5th birthday(growing fangs) than it will NEVER HAPPEN" he was a human up until his fangs grew this is a fact. and since he is half human there is abolutely no proof that he can't get his picture taken
share[deleted]