Really good martial arts movie . . . but is it really a ninja movie?
So I watched it tonight. And I have to say it was actually better than I expected it to be from the trailer. I'd give it a solid 7.5 or even 8 out of 10.
It's clear that the production values for this film are higher in all aspects than the first film and the choreography is top notch. Everything felt more expensive in general and this is probably one of those rare instances where the sequel is better than the first movie. One thing I really have to give the filmmakers credit for is foregoing all the CGI and relying on practical effects here. The action felt grounded in reality and lot of it felt like the action movies of the 80s and 90s, which is a good thing.
Kane Kosugi does a really good job and it's interesting to see him so many years later, after seeing him in movies like Revenge of the Ninja and Prey for Death.
However, is it really a ninja movie? While the ninja element is tied into the story a bit better than the trailer would have you believe, it really feels more like a standard martial arts movie in ninja garb rather than a true ninja movie. The predominant martial art that was portrayed overtly in the film was karate. Not only were the dojos clearly karate dojos but most of the fighting we see is essentially karate + some taekwondo kicks.
Now, as a Shotokan practitioner myself, I can't say this is all bad. We need more karate shown on screen and more movies that are karate-centric. But this film is Ninja 2. And I would certainly be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed that it didn't feel like a true ninja movie.
All in all though, I liked it. I was surprised by how much, in fact. I think Isaac and crew did a good job overall and you can tell they really put a lot of work into this project.