LGBT Agenda


I have just started watching this series (up to episode 4) and it just feels like its really pushing the LGBT element in my face. Like every time the lesbians are on screen we see they're kissing and as it stands there is literally nothing else to Nomis character other then shes Gay and Transgender. Its so hollow and makes her character feel very 2D, less so for the actor as he has more going on in his life and seems to have more personality. But it just feels like that entire element has been handled rather badly and its just come of as obtrusive. In my opinion Black Sails handled LGBT characters perfectly, wish this was more like that...

reply

You should see 'How to get a away with murder' I call that an LGBT agenda.

reply

Oh boy. So the "gay agenda" people also migrated to Moviechat. Great.

How is two people in love kissing "an agenda"? You never kissed someone you love? You never loved maybe? I really don't know how to respond to people still using rhetoric like that nowadays.
If the goal is to "force" people to accept it, obviously it's failing since you are all offended by it so how can it be an agenda?

As for Nomi having nothing else going on than being gay and trans, how about all the hacking she does? There is literally not a single episode when they don't depend on her skills to get out of hot waters of some kind. I'm guessing your bias is showing a bit.

Also Jamie Clayton is not an actor and "he" is not doing anything. She's an actress.

And I'm not sure what you mean by "Black Sails handled LGBT characters perfectly" because there are at least 3 graphic lesbian scenes each season and the lead, who happens to be a gay man, is basically the ideal gay man for most "gay agenda" people: abstinent and away from the object of his affection so whew we won't have to see him... you know... act all gay and kiss someone. Yuck.

I think both shows have interesting LGBT characters who are more than their sexual orientation but I guess you need to be objective to see that.

reply

On the subject of black sails, flint is the perfect gay character because he's just a man who happens to gay, rather than a gay man. Hollywood might push its agenda of equality every awards show, but think about how gay man are portrayed in Hollywood. Almost nothing but effeminate attention seeking comic relief. It's no wonder people that have never had contact with the gay community think that they only come in that one flavour.

An LGBT character that will actually bring acceptance is one that is more than their sexuality. Black sails is about a man so heart broken he wants to destroy an empire. The fact he's gay has nothing to do with it. And that's the way it should be. LGBT persons in real life are more than just a slogan, they have the same hopes and fears as everyone else and it's time art reflected that. It's time LGBT persons are shown to be people, not just some political foil to rattle when the cameras are on.

reply

I'm not sure what you mean by this LGBT agenda. Do you consider "chic flicks" to be pushing an agenda? This is a series created by persons who fit in the LGBTQ category, who wrote characters that represent themselves and others like them. How is that an agenda? There are many, many shows out there that represent straight, white, cis gendered people. (I'm not implying that you are, just stating fact). I'm just curious as to why it has to be an agenda to create art that represents oneself?

reply

Depends how it's done. I've not watched sense8 yet and properly never will now that it ends on a cliff hanger, but if LGBT characters are just there for the sake of having LGBT characters there then I would say that was pushing an agenda. If the characters have arcs and are involved in plots outside of their sexuality then I'd just call them characters. Even then if there is a love story plot, it still has to be more than LGBT for the sake of it. for example if the story was a romcom that happened to be about LGBT persons, that would fine. It's about the characters, and not who or what the characters are. If that makes sense?

It always come down to one question, is the character a gay character or are they a character that happens to be gay. What is that characters defining attribute. Unless the story is about LGBT rights, or the character is an advocate for LGBT community in some way they should never be defined by their sexuality. no one should ever be defined by their sexuality because we are all more than what we have between our legs, or who we are attracted to.

reply