On a recommendation, I watched this. Duplass can act well but the movie felt like it was 3 hours long. Found footage style movies are unmerciful to the viewers. Long takes of dry scenes for the sake of realism. 2/10
www.thecultofhorror.blogspot.com
[deleted]
Every movie on here has a thread titled garbage.you? Lol..i thought it was good. No movie is perfect. None.
shareI agree, terrible film. I don't normally mind found footage films but this just seemed pointless and predictable.
share[deleted]
I liked it. Very creepy.
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar and doesn't.
[deleted]
This movie lost respect imo when they forced jumpscares with the psycho screaming randomly, without purpose.
share[deleted]
The movie was... okay. The thing that kept me watching was the astonishing talent by Patrick Brice and Mark Duplass. Good chemistry between the two. Duplass had the expression in his eyes and Brice had the voice. The best example of performance took place when Duplass was bathing a baby but there was no baby. That was true acting!
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast
[deleted]
It was actually very experimental and only a closed minded retard would qualify it as "garbage"...
shareYeah, because no one is allowed to have their own opinion. SMH.
shareI get your point, but there is a line between saying your opinion and qualify a movie as "garbage".
I didn't like Lord of the Rings or Braveheart, but these movies are certainly no "garbage".
Yeah, but you did the same with your name calling. I know for a fact that you call things "garbage" or worse, that you don't like. Does the OP have to say it's garbage "in his/her opinion"? We all know that it is...
share