MovieChat Forums > Gods of Egypt (2016) Discussion > White Jesus and no one bat an eye, every...

White Jesus and no one bat an eye, everyone lose their mind over this?


Over the past 6000 years, Jesus are portrayed as a white skinny sleek man in every church over the world, and worshiped by so many over the years,

scientist discovered that Jesus DNA, geographical birthplace and ethnic status that HE is not white, they even have a computer generated portrait that look black and fat, have curly short hair and hairy chest.

.....and yet everyone is fighting over this fictional movie made for entertainment because they did not portraying Egyptian correctly.

reply

That's incorrect; this isn't a fictional movie made for entertainment but a documentary showing the natures of the true gods.

#‎BringF4Home

reply

People have done a lot of complaining about Jesus being portrayed white and rightfully so.

reply

6000 years?

Other than that, you're right though.

reply

Hes referring to caveman Jesus

reply

Hes referring to caveman Jesus


Thank you for that. I haven't laughed that hard in awhile. Too good, mate.

reply

May I ask where scientists have discovered and analysed Jesus´ DNA? By definition he didn´t leave behind any material from his body :)
Or are you referring to DNA from his descendants by Mary Magdalene, as proven by the evidence collected by Dan Brown?

reply

Hahahha. I love reading the comments imdb users make. Sometimes (and in this movies case), they are more entertaining then the movie.
:)

reply

right!!

reply

This movie was fun. Some people are just idiots.

reply

Mostly people who thought this was a good movie.

reply

Jesus was not Black, either. The world is not just b&w, you know.

reply

LOL. Yeah. People are going to go see Will Smith's son as their lord and savior.

Ever see After Earth? Anyone see that version of Hercules with The Rock? lol. No? Because blackwashing a character that is traditionally white... like a god does not go over well.

Of course, that Hercules also failed because it sucked.

But frankly, no black man out there could play a better Jesus Christ than the very Caucasian Jim Caviezel.

reply

Yea jesus is portrayed always as white and in many cases blond with blue eyes... yeah cause back in the day Nazareth was a city of Sweden.

Now he is portrayed like that for the last 1500 or so, the myth of jesus says that he was born 2016 years ago, not 6000 years ago...
if you know something about people depicting him 3984 years before his myth... please let us know.

jesus DNA? You do know that there nothing to back up that jesus even existed right? Let alone finding his DNA.
We have more evidences that Zeus existed than jesus.

What scientist have is a depiction of how male guys in the area were looking like 2000 years ago and nothing more.

reply

We have more evidences that Zeus existed than jesus.

historically, it is pretty clear, that Jesus, founder of christianity really lived.

what is not scientifically proven, of course, are things like resurrection and his deity.

reply

No it isnt and you have nothing to back this up, on the contrary we know that the bible is a man made work of fiction and everything in there is a lie.
+You might want to read about "Flavians".
Jesus never existed, period. Get over it.

reply

[deleted]

there's a lot of historical source material in it.

Like? name one?

Keep getting your history from stuff on par with infowars and r/atheism and ancient aliens all you like

....and thats the proof that you are pulling things out of your bottom you delusional imbecile.
When you talk to me, do not make assumptions about me, let alone presenting them as facts you delusional uneducated ignorant fk.

About jesus you have no fking idea what you are talking about and you have nothing to back up your idiotic sayings, pulling thins out of your bottom like "most historians" and BS like that wont pass on me.

Do you have anything to prove jesus existed? any? any at all? no? no? fk off then.

reply

[deleted]

First things first,
You pulled things out of your bottom and you presented them as facts, only a delusional idiot does that.
If you got offended, then you shouldnt make dumb assumptions for things that you have no idea.

Second,
Wtf is with that long @ss post? ffs there is no way anyone reading it.
If you dont have anything better to do at least make it more sufficient so others can read it, no one wants to spend 2 hours reading a post and its links.

Third,
From reading a few lines here and there... and where is the proof that jesus existed? "some believe" and "some think" isnt a proof you know?

Fourth,
About the facts in bible... let me put it this way....
Spiderman in the comics lives in new york, that doesnt mean that Spiderman is real, now does it?
In the bible says that Egyptians did this and that, noone argues that the werent/arent egyptians, but every single thing in the bible about the egyptians is utter BS.

Fifth,
You posted links about some historical facts etc etc... where is the bible counter parts?
Like: "Here is the historical facts" and "Here is what the bible says" eee?

Note* If you are about to reply, do NOT do it with 10 posts as long as the milkyway galaxy, I wont even bother reading it, let alone replying.



reply

[deleted]

Imma just quote you:

""of course you turned it to personal insults... every uneducated, uncivilized, person when he runs out of arguments does that..."
"Yeah now that shoved your beyond words dumb argument up your bottom, you've started to call names... hahhaha"

I pretty conclusively demonstrated that what you refer to as "pulled things out of your bottom" were uncontroversial statements about the widely known and accepted state of a field, even by the dissenters in that field, and thoroughly and directly sourced from it. This is outright denialism from you. It is akin to me saying "virtually all climate scientists believe in anthropogenic global warming", providing dozens of sources that show this, and you saying I pulled it out of my bottom. In other words, you are completely pulling it out of your bottom, and bizarrely attributing your approach to me.


Facepalm... YOu dont even know why I called you.... I mean are you serious? really now? You didnt even understartd which things IO said that you were pulling outr of you bottom... re-re-re-re read the bloody post and the quotes.... damn it.
How hard can it be?

Your refusal to spend so much as 5 A4 pages reading is pretty much a problem I can't account for. You can solve this by spending 20 seconds skimming ANY general overview in the field about the historicity of Jesus (even any of the ones I quoted), but you aren't even bothering to go that far.

I simply cannot account for you rejecting checking & sourcing & demonstrating information, and dismissing the process of it as pulling things out of one's ass.

Ye sorry that I dont want to go through a book of speculations, ifs, maybes and BS...

No, it doesn't mean Spider Man is real, which doesn't make descriptions of historical events not historical source material. And historical source material in the Bible doesn't mean everything in it is real, which I already accounted for. You really need to read before you reply.
No, you still dont get it, everything in the bible is BS, every-single-word, and unless you come up with HARD FACTS, you need to start understanding what you are reading, and you clearly proved that you do NOT know what you are reading like I pointed out in the start of this post.

Like I said, but this quote of yours demonstrates that you don't even know I said it:

* I think it's logically possible that Jesus did not exist.
* I am not arguing that I have proof that Jesus existed.
Still zero...

* Historians on the other hand, have a broad consensus that he existed.

No let me enlighten you cause clearly you have no clue... historians say that there MIGHT have been a person called jesus in the area at the time, BUT at the time in the area there were several guys calling themselves messiah, miracle makers etc etc... A "Jesus" as described in the bible never existed, nor anything in the background story... Like "jesus from Nazareth"... What Nazareth?

* If you disagree with their consensus, fine, but you are taking a stance that's completely opposed to most professionals in the field

Most professionals? Which ones do you mean exactlly? Cause NOONE accpets jesus as historical figure, letting aside that we have more things to prove that Zeus, Apollon etc existed than jesus.

Similarly, I cannot prove quantum mechanics or anthropogenic global warming, but I don't claim to.
I wish I have read this line before writing all this.... let me put it this way...
YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT! You have no concept of science nor facts.
Just for saying that renders beyond words ignorant, fool and utterly utterly uneducated. FACT!

You CAN porve QM, and you CAN prove anthropogenic CLIMATE CHANGE! not GW... you are hopeless

Why the fk you couldnt start your post with that line? fk sakes you would have saved me all this typing.

I cannot prove quantum mechanics
WTF??? what the actual fk??? Not enough hands to facepalm...

You can spend time reading BS useless fking crap like jesus and bible, "ifs", "maybes", "some say" and making looooooong @ss post to forums that noone gives a fk, but you cant spend time reading physics and about the environment and the planet that you live in... right right....

I am done talking with, your are hopeless.

I cannot prove quantum mechanics
...fk sakes...


reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]