Belle's inheritance
In the film, Belle inherited an annuity of 2,000 pounds per year. It's said in the film to be a substantial amount. Can anyone give me an idea of how much this amounted to, perhaps in terms of purchasing power?
shareIn the film, Belle inherited an annuity of 2,000 pounds per year. It's said in the film to be a substantial amount. Can anyone give me an idea of how much this amounted to, perhaps in terms of purchasing power?
shareIt's too generous speaking of the filmmakers.
Mr Bennet (not great estate owner from Austen's Pride and Prejudice) had an income like this, about £2,000 a year; but he had quite a family to keep having 5 daughters, it seems he wasn't able to save much. Or not so great as a manager... But they had a pretty house, an equipage, decent closing - I mean, it was quite enough for provincial not a great way of living.
Miss Bennet's admirer Mr Bingley had £5,000 a year, which meant pretty money even for living in high society, even in London. And to rent an estate in the meantime, planning to buy one of his own in some near future.
And at last, Miss Lizzy's suitor Mr Darcy had £10,000 a year, which made him the owner of one of the best estates in Derbyshire and a person who might be considered among 10 of the most important people in those times.
But alas, real Dido got only 100 pounds a year and a sum like 500 pounds from her Unkle's will, so after he died, his successor quickly married Dido, already 30 years spinster with some money, to his servant of French origin John Davinier. And that was the end of her living in the grandeur of Kenwood estate.
Did Daviniers really work for the second Earl? I did not know that. Was an inconvenient Belle got rid of? Link pls!
shareNo, not for sure.
But more likely he was his servant of some kind... But a servant still.
I've read lots of articles about Belle, but little is known about her "for sure".
Quicky can find in my archive only this:
When Lord Mansfield died in 1793, Belle lost her friend and protector – but she had become a woman of some means. Belle was in her 30s and no doubt considered herself past marriageable age. How she met her husband, a servant of French extraction called John Davinier, remains a mystery.
It seems probable that Lord Stormont took it upon himself to solve the problem of what to do with her when he moved into Kenwood by setting her up with one of his own men. Two years after their marriage Belle gave birth to twin boys, Charles and John, though it appears that John did not survive infancy. Another son, William Thomas, was born in 1800.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-2618656/Portrait-mystery-l ady-The-incredible-story-18th-century-painting-inspired-new-movie.html
Some bits in Wiki -
After her great-uncle's death in March 1793, Belle married John Davinier, a Frenchman who worked as a gentleman's steward, on 5 December 1793 at St. George's, Hanover Square.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dido_Elizabeth_Belle
Thank you so much for the reply :-)
shareBut alas, real Dido got only 100 pounds a year and a sum like 500 pounds from her Unkle's will, so after he died, his successor quickly married Dido, already 30 years spinster with some money, to his servant of French origin John Davinier. And that was the end of her living in the grandeur of Kenwood estate.
You're wrong. The Web full of such rubbish about Dido now. People like to be soooo kind as to give the poor soul that grand inheritance, clever loving husband and so to speak, everything what cost them nothing really.
shareI've seen two source that said that her father, great uncle, and his great uncle sister left her money.
Even though, a person can't believe half of what they see in movies, in this case, it is safe to assume she got 2000 pounds like the movie said. I know it's up to debate, but it appears with the fancy wedding she had, fancy baptisms of her children, she got paid.
http://englishhistoryauthors.blogspot.com/2014/12/dido-elizabeth-belle .html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/10863078/Dido-Belle-Britains-f irst-black-aristocrat.html
I've seen two source
You see rather dismissive of Dido. Why is that? Are you stuck up, or just a racist?
He left a legacy of 1000 pounds to an illegitimate son and 1000 pounds to a daughter named Elizabeth who may (or may not) have been Dido. Most sources indicate that Dido inherited from her father, but there seems to be some uncertainty about it.
Where do you see the proof?
So, again, don't confuse people. Lindsay had several white illegitmate children from different women - except black Belle.
Very likely the family quickly forgot all about Dido as soon as she left Kenwood house. Frankly, why shouldn't they?
You see rather dismissive of Dido
just a racist
John Linsday had two known children, as dictated by his will
Who do you think Elizabeth is?
archeology study in Florida
she was a member of the household for so many years
A Google search resulted in "10,000 pounds in 1800 would be worth about $14.4 Million dollars today". So that would mean Dido's annual 2,000 pound annuity would be worth about $2.8 Million/yr. Of course, as the other poster pointed out, in reality Dido got 100 pounds/yr(or about $140,000) and a 500 pound lump sum($700,000). According to Wikipedia, her cousin inherited a lump sum of 10,000 pounds($14.4 Million).
shareThe CDKO, an index measuring prices stood at 5.0 in 1750 and reached 10.0 by 1800.
by 2003 this had reached 700, meaning that prices were effectively 70 to 140 times as high
So £2000 per year might have represented about £200,000 pa today - obviously an income making a person very well off.
In comparisson to earnings at the time, it is probably even more wealthy.
One sovereign (gold pound) is equivalent to roughly a quarter oz of gold. At the present price of gold, about $300. Thus, 2000 pounds = $600,000. a tidy sum.
OTOH, gold likely had somewhat more purchasing power than now. E.g., in the 19th century, a policeman (considered a skilled workman) earned about a pound a week.
Inflation was steadily eroding the value of a pound over the centuries. So you can't equate a pound in the 18th century with a pound today.
I've heard it said that back in the 18th century a pound or two was what a common laborer would earn in a year. So 2000 pounds would be the equivalent of what 1000 to 2000 minimum wage workers would earn today. That would certainly be a comfortable living, but not in the range of Bill Gates.
[deleted]