MovieChat Forums > Belle (2014) Discussion > Dido and Jane Austen?

Dido and Jane Austen?


I read somewhere that Jane Austen was vaguely aware of Dido during the Mansfield Park period. Would it be possible, maybe from a "what if" view point, to have a story where Jane Meets Dido? Perhaps that would make a more interesting work of prose than a movie.

reply

Why not? I wouldn't be surprised if she was aware, considering the fact Dido's great-uncle Lord Mansfield was England’s most powerful judge, which would attract a lot of attention.

Miss Lambe in Austen's incomplete novel Sandition is mixed race black. Quote: "about seventeen, half mulatto, chilly and tender, with a maid of her own". More details can be found here: http://janeausten-herlifeandworks.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/sundry-thoughts-on-sanditon.html Miss Lambe was based on a real-life black heiress living in Bath. If Austen noticed this heiress, then it's easy to guess that she would be aware of Dido as well.

I don't think they met in real life, though, but there's nothing wrong with creating a story that would have them meeting. That's what fiction is all about. :)

reply

Lord Mansfield was the most powerful judge, but not Dido. Nearly all of you tend to elevate her person, her importance over the top. Thanks to the romcom "Belle", no doubt. Even her relatives after her guard's death chose to get rid of her, and forget very quickly. Lord Judge might like her very much, but not the rest of his wealthy and famous family.
It's easy to read about real Dido.
Actually, after her marriage to Davinier who as a steward, Dido lived in London till she died in 1804. Austen hated London, and seldom visited the town even when she became a published writer and had to, from time to time.

Really interesting though, that Austen met Elizabeth Murray in her brother Edward Austen (Knight) house - http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol31no1/jones.html

Austen knew Lady Elizabeth personally in her later life, after she had married and become Lady Elizabeth Finch-Hatton. The two women’s meetings are recorded several times in Austen’s letters between 1805 and 1813 when the Finch-Hattons were neighbors of the Edward Austen (from 1812 Edward Knight) family in Kent. It seems from Austen’s comments that she was aware of Lady Elizabeth’s ancestry and origins, and was disappointed not to find her a more interesting person or more forthcoming in conversation. On 24 August 1805, for example, Jane reported to Cassandra: “I have discovered that Ly Eliz:th for a woman of her age & situation, has astonishingly little to say for herself, & that Miss Hatton has not much more.” Subsequently the taciturnity of Lady Elizabeth and her daughters became a running joke between the Austen sisters (see 30 June-1 July 1808; 26 October 1813, and 6-7 November 1813), and it has been suggested that Lady Elizabeth may have been the model for the “elegant but dumb” ladies in Austen’s fiction, including Lady Middleton in Sense and Sensibility, and of course Lady Bertram in MansfieldPark (Lawrence).

reply

You assumed I was referring to her social status when in fact, I was referring to Lord Mansfield's critics, who questioned his ability to be 'rational' as the Lord Chief Justice.

They made veiled attacks, through newspapers and pamphlets, in implying that a 'certain resident' in his household was distorting his ability to be objective in several cases involving West Indians and Africans. Bearing in mind that Lord Mansfield had never publicly acknowledged Dido's existence until the publication of his will shortly after his death.

Nearly all of you tend to elevate her person, her importance over the top. Thanks to the romcom "Belle", no doubt.


Meanwhile, you may have misunderstood or missed the historical context. The upper and middle classes including the local gentry certainly were aware of her existence. Just as much as they were aware of other non-white people among their own including:

Julius Soubise, who attended Eton under the Duchess of Queensbury's care and was a regular in her social circle (and had had affairs with her friends); Nathaniel West, a wealthy landowner in Wales; Alice Long, an illegitimate daughter of the Duke of Somerest; Mooti Begum Dalrymple, Indian bride of James Dalrymple; two West Indian heiresses who married two Scottish nobles and settled in Scotland; Cesar Picton, a black wealthy merchant; Philip Quaque, ordained as an Anglican minister under the Church of England in London; Mohammed Sake, an Indian entrepreneur and a favourite among the nobility in London and Brighton, and many more. Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool and one-time Prime Minister, was a grandson of a mixed-race Indian. He wasn't the only one, either. Contemporary newspapers, primary sources and historians back all this up.

As you probably already know, the nobility and the gentry were a small world, which made it horribly easy for most to be aware of who was who and the like. And most secrets. Such as illegitimate children. Are we even surprised? Not only they were well connected, they had so much time on their hands that gossiping and news sharing, in person and letter correspondence, was heavily part of the day. :D

But yes; in most cases, it was an open secret. Dido was an open secret. Some were both an open secret and a publicised presence. For instance, most - the society, the public and the press - were aware that three of Queen Victoria's godchildren and regular visitors to her homes, weren't white: Guwri, Duleep Singh and Sarah Forbes Bonetta.

The public and the press knew that Sarah Bonetta attended Princess Victoria's wedding in 1858 and Princess Alice's private wedding at Osborne House in 1862, and that Queen Victoria received regular visits from Bonetta at Windsor Castle and Obsorne House. They however didn't know that apart from Bonetta's four-year absence, Bonetta and Princess Alice socialised together every other month until their marriages in 1862, and they corresponded since until Alice's death in 1878. The well-do society knew, though. Not surprising, seeing that Queen Victoria's ladies in waiting and private secretaries were part of the society themselves.

reply

I know, lots of mulatto girls-boys, it was quite fashionable in XVIII century; and the famous portrait Dido-Elizabeth just a bit differ from many others where a lady and her Negro maid might be seen.
Maybe Dido was of interest - then, but what I want to stress - as soon as her guard was dead and his successor had Dido quickly married off, actually getting rid of her - all the fuss was over. The Judge might be fond of Dido, but the new owner of his estate obviously wasn't.

So - I'm more interested in this - when Jane Austen emerged on the scene, hardly any talk over Dido in any society circulated still, I'm sure. As you write yourself, she was no unique then.

Till Dido's story was re-discovered quite recently, even the Mansfields had no idea that the coloured girl behind Lady Elizabeth was related her - they were sure she was just her maid. When I was in Scone Palace surely there was no talk about Dido. Though they are very proud of all their paintings, to be sure.

reply

Oh, my goodness! Thank you for your wonderful reply, Zerose! I have always been intrigued by the "what if" of life and even movies and books: What if Hitler made it as an artist, what if Castro was a successful baseball player, what if, what if, what if?

Why not? I love the plot of a show called Outlander, where a woman falls through time and goes back to another age and tries to help change certain courses of Scottish history for the better. The "what if" scenario has always been intriguing to me.

Yes. I saw the romantic movie about Dido and that brought me here. Thank you for that link, too.

reply