Miss him
Am I the only one who misses Roger Ebert everytime I'm reading the critic reviews for a movie. His word was gold. I loved both agreeing, and disagreeing with him. Fantastic writer. Miss him so much.
shareAm I the only one who misses Roger Ebert everytime I'm reading the critic reviews for a movie. His word was gold. I loved both agreeing, and disagreeing with him. Fantastic writer. Miss him so much.
share I miss him very much.
I watched Siskel and Ebert ever since the 70s. I watched them every week, it was appointment viewing, and I never (or very rarely) missed an episode. I watched them until the late 90s, when Gene Siskel passed away, and continued to follow Ebert on TV, the papers, and eventually almost exclusively on his webpage and blog, for years after that.
It is truly the end of an era for film critics. With older giants like Vincent Canby and Pauline Kael long gone, and now the baby boomer era's biggest critics, Siskel and Ebert, both gone, there is really no one in the field that I really follow regularly anymore.
Now, every time a new film is coming out, I wonder what Ebert would have thought of it.
It's very fitting that Martin Scorsese and Steve James are behind this film, which will surely be a very moving, yet also quite depressing, film.
Interview subjects include filmmaking masters such as Werner Herzog and Martin Scorsese, and that is very fitting, as Ebert was a great champion of their work. He recognized the genius of both before anyone else did.
I saw a brief clip of Scorsese, in a very uncharacteristically emotional mode, fondly remembering Ebert and encouraging people to see this film. THAT brief clip nearly made me choke up.
I know the film will devastate me.
It could affect younger people who have only followed Ebert for a short time, but for someone who followed the man's writing and criticism since the early 70s, it is like we lost an old friend...
I totally agree with you. Even when I completely disagreed with him, I could understand his points and his way of thinking. And you could tell that he was passionate about film and that passion was contagious. Furthermore, he brought passion into everything he wrote about, and as an avid follower of his online writings, he wrote about so many different things.
Even when he was wrong, he had a point.
BTW, I've also missed his old partner, Gene Siskel. I never met the guy but I did receive a personal e-mail from him once in response to a post I made on the Prodigy computer system (back before the world wide web was big). Just the fact that he'd take the time to respond to a young stranger interested in movies really stuck with me.
I had the same thing (an answered email) with Ebert. See separate thread. Same reaction as you.
shareTriple seconded.
shareI will always miss:
"What were they thinking!!!"
Roger Ebert proved over and over the job of a film critic is to tell the viewer why a film is good or bad even if he is not a fan of a particular genre. That's not easy to do. It can be very hard for a critic to keep personal bias the favors or dislikes a studio, actor, director, etc.
Same. One thing I loved about Ebert was that he wasn't a sheep. If he liked a film most critics hated he wasn't afraid to show that he liked it. And when he disliked a movie for whatever reason he explained his reasons thoroughly, whereas most other critics would be overly sarcastic and mean.
shareI miss him as well. I was lucky enough to meet him 5 times and he always gave me a thumbs up when he saw me. He was my hero and I'll never forget his kindness.
shareAm I the only one who misses Roger Ebert everytime I'm reading the critic reviews for a movie. His word was gold. I loved both agreeing, and disagreeing with him. Fantastic writer. Miss him so much.
In so many ways...he was truly a hero to me.
shareSomeone was tossing away a stack of his movie books from 88-94. They're now sitting on my shelves at home.
Ha ha, yeah, I have a few moth-eaten copies of his Video Home Companions. I once got caught at B. Dalton Books for trying to steal one of the little "movie checklists" that came with the companions. He was truly remarkable, definitely one of the people who got me into movies when I was about twelve. I'd read other critics, sure, but not one can break it down in unpretentious language why pretentious films can be worth your time. Or junk food McMovies can be good too. He didn't discriminate and had one of the most open minds. He was the kind of critic who would give a movie like "Strange Days" a glowing four-star review. He didn't care what other critics thought. He famously trashed Blue Velvet (one of my favorite movies), but, you know what? He had a point. Rosselini did some truly uncomfortable scenes. I love this exchange: (paraphrased)
Siskel: He is doing what all great directors do, and Hichcock did it, which is to play you like a piano.
Ebert: If a director wants to play ME like a piano, he better get some music that's worth listening too.
Siskel: I think it's a good song!
Yes, perfect! I was the same age, in 7th grade when my friend and I would do little spoofs of Gene and Roger on audiotape. As you said, there was a certain "simple eloquence" to his verbal and written reviews and I was glad to try to find the movies he spoke of over whatever blockbuster was due in theaters. I once shocked my mother by asking for tickets to Cannes, even though I had no idea where it was. I felt like Roger treated some of his favorites in the same way you'd champion a good friend, as if they were people that he wanted you to meet. Similar to your Blue Velvet comment, I clearly remember when the pair ripped into the rising slasher/dead teenager genre. I was mixed as I did (and still do, in retrospect) enjoy those kind of cash grab and exploitation flicks of, say '81. On the other hand, I loved how they called out producers such as Golan and Globus by name, saying they should be "ashamed of themselves."
To sum it all up, it was a fantastic time to be a movie fan and Roger made it all the better.