MovieChat Forums > Brooklyn (2015) Discussion > She seemed in a daze.

She seemed in a daze.


I know I'll get flack about this, but I thought Eilis looked like she was sleep-walking most of the time. Her face was expressionless for the most part, and she showed very little reaction when someone was speaking to her. I know it was the character, but it got a little boring.

reply

Oh I thought it was the actress's lack of acting skills XD

yeah I thought the same too - kept wondering why on earth *she* was chosen to play a role that involves depicting very complex emotion....

reply

So she didn't "emote" enough for you guys? 'Tis such a pity. 

reply

Emoting is part of acting or else we would just read books and scripts.

reply

I thought Ronan did a great job. For example, after her character had dinner at Tony's house, and is a bit put off by his talking about their future kids, we then see her leaving night school. She walks out, expecting to see Tony, doesn't see him where she expects him, and scans the sidewalk and looks around. We then see her clearly disappointed expression. Not just disappointed, sad. She walks off, deflated. Then he calls her name. She turns and her expression brightens. A bit after that she very earnestly tells him she loves him too, but also firmly tells him not to put on the pressure when it comes to kids.

The two of them also share a sense of humor and like to snark at each other - we can see it in their expressions when they speak together.

She is kind of blank at home in Ireland, but I think that's a choice. She's passive at home. Then she's livelier with her friend Nancy, and then passive when with her mother. I think she feels guilty and at a loss. She has no job, no way of getting one, and any late teen-age girl would lack some confidence with a sister who is accomplished, and does everything for you, and there's no way of your improving your own lot.

Also, that mother (brilliant performance by the actress) - is presented as this oppressive presence - that once you're in her presence, the overwhelming guilt will suck you in and overpower your will. That was especially clear when Eilis returned to Ireland. I thought Ronan made one very good choice. It was the first time one of the villagers hinted at marriage to Jim (not the one who trilled "Jim and Eilis, Eilis and Jim, but someone even earlier) - you can see Eilis's eyes go blank. A wall goes up, like she's pretending she can't hear or understand what the woman is on about.

reply

I, too, think she was excellent.

It seems some here are missing that what she is performing is a deep loneliness. I was struck by how effectively the film showed how it feels to be truly lonely.

reply

Correction: "emoting" all too often is part of overacting.

reply

Soooo, you're being sarcastic about people thinking she didn't "emote" enough OR you think she's overacting? Troll.

reply

Ah, using the "troll" label. The ultimate sign that you don't have a freakin' clue as to what you're trying to debate.

What more should she have done to satisfy your image of an ideal acting performance? Shriek a lot louder when she read letters from home? Scream like hell at the bitchy store owner towards the end of the movie? Hump Jim's leg when they're dancing?

imo she allowed her expressions and yes, her silences, to speak volumes about her character, her feelings, her responses. I think she played it true to the character in the way the movie unfolds. And she apparently was effective enough in her portrayal to earn well over a dozen nominations (and several top awards) from various academies, guilds, film societies and critics' circles.

But then I guess you're the real expert.

reply

It's beyond rude to call someone a troll.

reply

Eilis might be the most passive and sheltered protagonist I've ever encountered on the page. She has no goals or desires (until maybe at the end), and is ill-equipped to interpret her experiences. Ronan gave a beautiful performance in this constrained role.

reply

You weren't looking deep enough. Admittedly, she doesn't laugh much, and she only cries sparingly. However, her face is alive all the time. In every single shot you can clearly say what her emotions are - homesickness, timidity, grief, happiness... it's all there, and I've relished it all.

reply

It was one of the most beautiful performances I've ever seen on film. And she was nominated for Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role. For this film. So...

reply

I agree. I kept waiting for her to feel something but it never happened. She's too passive.

reply