MovieChat Forums > Spectre (2015) Discussion > Blue-eyed Bond from now on?

Blue-eyed Bond from now on?


Since he was referred to as “a poor little blue-eyed orphan" by Blofeld, is that James Bond canon from now on?

____________________
The story is king.

reply

That's a good question actually. Not sure if the next Bond actor will be blue eyed. Even though the next Bond actor isn't blue eyed he can still be canon with the Daniel Craig films to keep continuity in the timeline which was rebooted in 2006 with Casino Royale

reply

Blue Eyed Bonds:

Roger Moore
Timothy Dalton
Pierce Brosnan
Daniel Craig

Next Brown Eyed Bond:

Idris Elba

reply

Easily addressed with digital effects.

Heck, they're almost able to reintroduce Connery Bond with CGI nowadays.

What no man Can give ya. And none Can take away.

reply

They've done it with colored contact lenses in the past, but I think they'd opt for the digital solution in the future.

They did a lot of digital reconstruction to finish Paul Walker's scenes in Furious Seven. They could probably do complete movie star synthesis from just some basic motion capture and facial 3D analysis.

The movie stars wouldn't even need to show up after the preliminary digital capture and analysis work. They would have a complete, real-seeming 3D CGI character in the computer, and just put it through its paces, like Shrek.

____________________
The story is king.

reply

They did a lot of digital reconstruction to finish Paul Walker's scenes in Furious Seven. They could probably do complete movie star synthesis from just some basic motion capture and facial 3D analysis.
Yes, and that was not an easy process for them.

They had to use any data they could to recreate every angle, facial expression, word he says, etc. from the previous FF films, and they had to use his brothers to even get a slight match. All the meanwhile, he was mostly placed in areas of lowlight, had the camera back on him many times, or for distant shots. Parts were also rewritten to accommodate this, likely not just for the new ending but also because there were parts that would have been impossibly difficult to film.

I think we are much farther away than people imagine. We've just finally gotten good at de-aging effects, but even then it's still painfully obvious when they do so. I know you are referring to using a live person and getting their facial scans and motion capture, but in the end it will still have some "video game" feel to them. Look at Avatar. I'm sure its sequels will be breathtaking, but they will still be CGI after all.

Changing eye color is something completely different, and digital would likely be the way they go but I bet they still use colored contacts to get a preliminary "close" match, again just like Paul's brothers standing in on his behalf.

** Rest in peace, Timothy Volkert (1988 - 2003) **

reply

I don't think that line is going to do enough to enforce in peoples mind that Bond is blue eyed as a defining trait. They will get the right actor for the job in the next few years and not bother tinkering with eye colour just for for that.

Tatiana references Bond's brown eyes in FRWL and it had no bearing on future casting choices.

The mans tongue didnt come through customs!

reply

This exactly.

reply

Since he was referred to as “a poor little blue-eyed orphan" by Blofeld, is that James Bond canon from now on?

It already is.

Ian Fleming described him with blue eyes. Actually blue-gray.

Actor that comes closest to Fleming's description of Bond is Pierce Brosnan.

From Fleming's novels:

slim build; a three-inch long, thin vertical scar on his right cheek; blue-grey eyes; a "cruel" mouth; short, black hair, a comma of which falls on his forehead. 183 centimetres (6 feet) in height and 76 kilograms (168 lb) in weight.


And, why, on a thread and even a board that I suspect is male dominated, is it the woman who knows this? Do you males not read the original Bond books?

Sad.

reply

The books are a different world from the movies. And I think that usually only the titles and character names are the same, by licensing.

Up until Spectre (2015), George Lazenby and Sean Connery had brown eyes, all the others blue or grey-blue eyes.

So it looks like the books, being a separate world, had not established blue-grey eyes as canon. And the movies made eye color a non-issue.

The question is, does Blofeld's description in a movie establish it now as movie canon? The answer is, whatever the filmmakers choose:
-Do they think contradicting Blofeld would cause a distracting controversy?
-Do blue-eyes also determine James Bond as white? Probably, I'd say.
-Might they just choose a blue-eyed actor by coincidence, regardless of Blofeld?
-And would the next one after that be blue-eyed, if there still are James Bond movies?





____________________
The story is king.

reply

The books are a different world from the movies.

If you're going to go with that, then the Craig movies are in a different world from the other movies. And in that world Bond has blue eyes.

And I think that usually only the titles and character names are the same, by licensing.

More proof that the fanboys on here haven't even bothered to read the original books.

Get the Fleming books.............and read them.

Right now your ignorance is showing.

reply

And I think that usually only the titles and character names are the same, by licensing.

https://www.quora.com/How-do-the-Bond-movies-differ-from-the-books

Please notice the word "usually". The statement is correct.

____________________
The story is king.

reply

Why are you harping about the books? Different "canon" entirely.

reply